Wyo. Stat. § 6-2-106
Homicide by vehicle; aggravated homicide by
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WY-LEGwyoleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
vehicle; penalties.
(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section,
a person is guilty of homicide by vehicle and shall be fined not
more than two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) or imprisoned in the
county jail for not more than one (1) year, or both, if he
operates or drives a vehicle in a criminally negligent manner,
and his conduct is the proximate cause of the death of another
person. Evidence of a violation of any state law or ordinance
applying to the operation or use of a vehicle or to the
regulation of traffic, except for evidence of a violation of
W.S. 10-6-103, 31-5-233 and 41-13-206, is admissible in any
prosecution under this subsection.
(b) A person is guilty of aggravated homicide by vehicle
and shall be punished by imprisonment in the penitentiary for
not more than twenty (20) years, if:
(i) While operating or driving a vehicle in violation
of W.S. 10-6-103, 31-5-233 or 41-13-206, he causes the death of
another person and the violation is the proximate cause of the
death; or
(ii) He operates or drives a vehicle in a reckless
manner, and his conduct is the proximate cause of the death of
another person.
(c) The department of transportation shall revoke the
license or permit to drive and the nonresident operating
privilege of any person convicted of aggravated homicide by
vehicle or of homicide by vehicle.
(d) Any person convicted of aggravated homicide by vehicle
for causing the death of another person while operating or
driving a vehicle in violation of W.S. 31-5-233 shall not be
issued an ignition interlock restricted license under W.S.
31-5-233 or 31-7-401 through 31-7-404.Notes of Decisions
Cited in 52
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1983–2026 · leading case: Allen v. State
Allen v. State (2002)
“Allen, guilty of two counts of aggravated vehicular homicide in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-106 (b) (LexisNexis 2001), and the district court sentenced appellant to serve 150 to 240 months in prison for each count, the sentences to run consecutively.”
Tucker v. State (2010)
“[¶ 1] Appellant, Richard Allen Tucker, challenges his convictions on two counts of aggravated vehicular homicide, in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-106 (b)(i) (LexisNexis 2007).”
Sodergren v. State (1986)
“1979 or § 6-2-106 W.S. 1983?" We will affirm. In a collision August 23, 1982, between a truck driven by appellant Barry Sodergren and a Pinto automobile driven by Mia Olsen, Miss Olsen and a passenger, her mother, were killed.”
Candelaria v. State (1995)
“Section 6-2-106 defines the crimes of homicide by vehicle and aggravated homicide by vehicle.”
State v. Sodergren (1984)
“" The recent changes in the two pertinent statutes cause them to read: "(a) A person is guilty of manslaughter if he unlawfully kills any human being without malice, expressed or implied, either: "(i) Voluntarily, upon a sudden heat of passion; or "(ii) Involuntarily, but: "(A)…”
Edward Christopher Barrowes v. State (2017)
“[¶1] Appellant Edward Barrowes challenges his conviction of aggravated vehicular homicide as defined by Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-106 (b)(ii) (LexisNexis 2015).”
Whitney v. State (2004)
“(the appellant) appeals his convictions for aggravated homicide by vehicle, a felony, in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-106 (b)G) (Lexis-Nexis 2008), and several misdemeanors.”
Caton v. State (1985)
“They are prohibited by subsection *1269 (a) of § 6-2-106 and provide for a $2,000 fine and/or a year in jail.”
Dangel v. State (1986)
“The question raised in this case is whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction of Bruce DeWayne Dangel for three counts of vehicular homicide in violation of § 6-2-106(a), W.S. 1977. [1] In addition Dangel relies upon the case of Eagan v.”
Breazeale v. State (2011)
“Breazeale guilty of aggravated vehicular homicide, in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-106 (b)(i) and () (LexisNexis 2009): A person is guilty of aggravated homicide by vehicle and shall be punished by imprisonment in the penitentiary for not more than twenty (20) years, if:…”
Sampsell v. State (2001)
“The State points out that the maximum punishment provided in Wyo.Stat.Ann. § 6-2-106 is twenty years, and the sentences should not be disturbed in the absence of an abuse of discretion.”
Bloomquist v. State (1996)
“Since the jury was able to choose alternative grounds on which to convict Appellant, he maintains that his trial counsel should have requested that the instruction be given which pertained to the lesser-included offense of homicide by vehicle, Wyo.Stat. § 6-2-106(a) (Supp.1995),…”
— Wyo. Stat. § 6-2-106(a) — 7 cases
Dangel v. State (1986)
“The question raised in this case is whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction of Bruce DeWayne Dangel for three counts of vehicular homicide in violation of § 6-2-106(a), W.S. 1977. [1] In addition Dangel relies upon the case of Eagan v.”
Candelaria v. State (1995)
“Section 6-2-106 defines the crimes of homicide by vehicle and aggravated homicide by vehicle.”
Allen v. State (2002)
“Allen, guilty of two counts of aggravated vehicular homicide in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-106 (b) (LexisNexis 2001), and the district court sentenced appellant to serve 150 to 240 months in prison for each count, the sentences to run consecutively.”
Bloomquist v. State (1996)
“Since the jury was able to choose alternative grounds on which to convict Appellant, he maintains that his trial counsel should have requested that the instruction be given which pertained to the lesser-included offense of homicide by vehicle, Wyo.Stat. § 6-2-106(a) (Supp.1995),…”
Edward Christopher Barrowes v. State (2017)
“[¶1] Appellant Edward Barrowes challenges his conviction of aggravated vehicular homicide as defined by Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-106 (b)(ii) (LexisNexis 2015).”
— Wyo. Stat. § 6-2-106(b) — 19 cases
Caton v. State (1985)
“They are prohibited by subsection *1269 (a) of § 6-2-106 and provide for a $2,000 fine and/or a year in jail.”
Sampsell v. State (2001)
“The State points out that the maximum punishment provided in Wyo.Stat.Ann. § 6-2-106 is twenty years, and the sentences should not be disturbed in the absence of an abuse of discretion.”
Volz v. State (1985)
Bloomquist v. State (1996)
“Since the jury was able to choose alternative grounds on which to convict Appellant, he maintains that his trial counsel should have requested that the instruction be given which pertained to the lesser-included offense of homicide by vehicle, Wyo.Stat. § 6-2-106(a) (Supp.1995),…”
Bell v. State (1985)
— Wyo. Stat. § 6-2-106(b)(i) — 4 cases
Strandlien v. State (2007)
Smith v. State (1996)
Edwards v. State (2007)
Glazier v. State (1992)
— Wyo. Stat. § 6-2-106(b)(ii) — 8 cases
Candelaria v. State (1995)
“Section 6-2-106 defines the crimes of homicide by vehicle and aggravated homicide by vehicle.”
Edward Christopher Barrowes v. State (2017)
“[¶1] Appellant Edward Barrowes challenges his conviction of aggravated vehicular homicide as defined by Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-106 (b)(ii) (LexisNexis 2015).”
Orona-Rangal v. State (2002)
McLaughlin v. State (1989)
Rogers v. State (1999)
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.