Wyoming Statutes
Wyo. Stat. § 6-3-106 (2026)
Failure to extinguish or contain fire outside;
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WY-LEGwyoleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
penalty. A person is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than seven hundred fifty dollars ($750.00) if he, outside of normal agronomic or forestry practices, lights a fire outdoors and leaves the vicinity of the fire without extinguishing it or containing it so it does not spread or conditions are such that the fire is not reasonably likely to spread.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1979–1990 · leading case: Miller v. State, 732 P.2d 1054 (Wyo. 1987).
Miller v. State, 732 P.2d 1054 (Wyo. 1987). “00) in violation of W.S. 1977, § 6-3-106 " COUNT II "On or about the 28th day of October, 1982, in the County of Natrona, State of Wyoming, the said JOHN G.”
Rummel v. Estelle, 445 U.S. 263 (1980). “20 (1958) (fine or up to 5 years); Wyo. Stat. § 6-3-106 (1977) (up to 10 years).”
Sanville v. State, 593 P.2d 1340 (Wyo. 1979). “The appellant-defendant was convicted of one count of obtaining money by false pretenses in violation of § 6-3-106, W.S.1977, 1 and one count of delivering a fraudulent check in violation of § 6-3-110, W.”
Barker v. State, 599 P.2d 1349 (Wyo. 1979). “Barker from a conviction of obtaining property by false pretenses under § 6-3-106, W.S.1977 1 , presents only one issue which we need resolve, namely: Was § 6-3-106, W.”
Lopez v. State, 788 P.2d 1150 (Wyo. 1990). “1979), were decided under Section 6-3-106, W.S.1977 (repealed ch. 75, Wyo.”
Fitzgerald v. State, 599 P.2d 572 (Wyo. 1979). “1957 (now § 6-3-106, W.S. 1977). Fitzgerald seeks reversal of this conviction, and in this appeal he asserts these claims of error: "1.”
Driver v. State, 589 P.2d 391 (Wyo. 1979). “This appeal primarily concerns the sufficiency and character of evidence necessary for a conviction of obtaining property by false pretenses in violation of § 6-3-106, W.S. 1977. We will affirm the conviction.”
Harris v. State, 635 P.2d 1165 (Wyo. 1981). “property by false pretenses under § 6-3-106, W.S.1977. Mr. Harris takes this appeal from the judgment and sentence entered on the jury’s verdict and raises the following issues for review: 1.”
McLaughlin v. State, 626 P.2d 63 (Wyo. 1981). “David McLaughlin was charged by information with one count of conspiracy to obtain money by false pretenses, as defined in § 6-3-106, W.S. 1977 [1] in violation of § 6-1-117, W.”
Lane v. State, 663 P.2d 175 (Wyo. 1983). “After a plea of guilty to an information charging appellant-defendant with obtaining property by false pretenses in violation of § 6-3-106, W.S.1977, he was called before the district court on October 30, 1980, for sentencing.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.