Wyo. Stat. § 7-11-202
Presence of defendant.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WY-LEGwyoleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Except as otherwise provided by this section, the defendant shall be present at the arraignment, at every stage of the trial, including the impaneling of the jury, and the return of the verdict and at the imposition of sentence. In prosecution for offenses not punishable by death, the defendant's voluntary absence after the trial has been commenced in his presence shall not prevent continuing the trial to and including the return of the verdict. A corporation may appear by counsel for all purposes. In prosecutions of all misdemeanor cases, the court, with the written consent of the defendant, may permit arraignment, plea, and imposition of sentence in a defendant's absence. The defendant's presence is not required at a reduction of sentence hearing.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1998–2023 · leading case: Woyak v. State
Woyak v. State (2010)
“Did the district court violate Woyak's constitutional rights to due process and confrontation by excluding him from a competency hearing in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-11-202 and W.R.Cr.P. 43? II.”
Belden v. State (2003)
“State, 959 P.2d 170, 177 (Wyo.1998). The right of the accused to be present at the critical stages of a trial is also explicitly guaranteed by Wyoming law.”
DeMillard v. State (2008)
“43(a) which provide that, exeept as otherwise provided by law, a defendant shall be present at his initial appearance, arraignment, plea, every stage of the trial (including the impaneling of the jury and the return of the verdict) and imposition of sentence. The constitutional…”
Johnson v. State (2003)
“[13] See Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-11-202 (LEXIS 1999); and Seeley v.”
Gleason v. State (2002)
“1, § 10 and Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-11-202 (LexisNexis 2001) provide an accused the right to defend in person.”
Campbell v. State (2000)
“These constitutional guarantees are incorporated into Wyo. Stat. § 7-11-202 and W.R.Cr.P. 43(a), which provide that a defendant shall be present "at every stage of the trial * * *.”
Seeley v. State (1998)
“Wyo. Stat. § 7-11-202 (1997); W.R.Cr.P. 43.”
Abeyta v. State (2003)
“See also Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-11-202 (Lexis-Nexis 2003) 4 The rule generally incorporates the constitutional guarantees associated with a defendant's "right to be present during every stage of the criminal proceeding that is critical to its outcome if his presence would…”
Skinner v. State (2001)
“These constitutional guarantees are incorporated into Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-11-202 (LexisNexis 2001) and W.”
Wall v. State (2019)
“Discussion [¶30] A defendant's right to be present at every stage of his trial is codified at Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-11-202 and W.R.Cr.P. 43(a) but arises from both the federal and Wyoming constitutions.”
Hauck v. State (2001)
“The constitutional guarantee has been embodied into Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-11-202 and W.R.Czr.P.”
Smith v. State (1999)
“He maintains that, pursuant to Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-11-202 (Michie 1997), he had the right to be present at every stage of the trial.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.