Wyoming Statutes
Wyo. Stat. § 7-11-507 (2026)
Advisement of loss of firearms rights upon
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WY-LEGwyoleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
conviction.
(a) No judgment of conviction shall be entered upon a plea
of guilty or nolo contendere to any charge which may result in
the disqualification of the defendant to possess firearms
pursuant to the provisions of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), (9) and
924(a)(2) or other federal law unless the defendant was advised
in open court by the judge:
(i) Of the collateral consequences that may arise
from that conviction pursuant to the provisions of 18 U.S.C. §§
921(a)(33), 922(g)(1), (9) and 924(a)(2); and
(ii) That if the defendant is a peace officer, member
of the armed forces, hunting guide, security guard or engaged in
any other profession or occupation requiring the carrying or
possession of a firearm, that he may now, or in the future, lose
the right to engage in that profession or occupation should he
be convicted.Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19
cases, 1986–2016 · leading case: Starrett v. State, 286 P.3d 1033 (Wyo. 2012).
Starrett v. State, 286 P.3d 1033 (Wyo. 2012). “Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-11-507 (LexisNexis 2011) (emphasis added).”
Christopher D. Balderson v. The State of Wyoming, 2013 WY 107 (Wyo. 2013). “19, § 1 (codified at Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-11-507 ). The statute provides as follows: (a) No judgment of conviction shall be entered upon a plea of guilty or nolo conten-dere to any charge which may result in the disqualification of the defendant to possess firearms pursuant to…”
Debora McEwan v. The State of Wyoming, 2013 WY 158 (Wyo. 2013). “11 and Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-11-507 ? 2. Was she deprived of her constitutional right to a speedy trial or the complementary right provided by W.”
Elton Henry v. State, 2015 WY 156 (Wyo. 2015). “Our ruling was recapped at the end of the opinion as follows: "[We must apply our de novo standard of review to the issue before us because that issue requires our interpretation and application of a statute, We hold that Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-11-507 is clear and unambiguous;…”
Timothy James Russell v. The State of Wyoming, 2013 WY 137 (Wyo. 2013). “Russell to withdraw his plea because it had not given the advisements required by Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-11-507 (LexisNexis 2018) at the plea hearing.”
State v. Dist. Court of the Second Jud. Dist., 715 P.2d 191 (Wyo. 1986). “Contrary to the claim of the State of Wyoming that §§ 7-11-507 and 7-11-511, W.S. 1977, have been superseded pursuant to Rule 56, W.”
Steven R. Barela v. State, 2016 WY 68 (Wyo. 2016). “However, because the advisement statute, Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-11-507 , was not enacted until 2009, the court noted that it was inapplicable to Appellant's case.”
Steven David Lunden v. The State of Wyoming, 2013 WY 35 (Wyo. 2013). “The State argues that this Court should not consider the appellant's argument because it is being raised for the first time on appeal.”
Kiet Hoang Nguyen v. The State of Wyoming, 2013 WY 50 (Wyo. 2013). “We recognized, however, that a claimed violation of Rule 11 would be reviewed for plain error if there was no objection below.”
Stogner v. State, 792 P.2d 1358 (Wyo. 1990). “[5a] Since our decision in that case, §§ 7-11-507 and 7-11-511 have been repealed and our holding in this case may no longer reflect the status of current law.”
Blas Pedraza, Jr. v. The State of Wyoming, 2014 WY 24 (Wyo. 2014). “" In his briefs, Appellant contends that his convictions should be reversed because he was not given the firearms advisement required by Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-11-507 . The State of Wyoming agrees.”
Robert J. Parks v. The State of Wyoming, 2014 WY 57 (Wyo. 2014). “" In his brief, Appellant contends his convictions should be reversed because he was not given the firearms advisement required by Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-11-507 . The State of Wyoming agrees.”
— Wyo. Stat. § 7-11-507(2) — 1 case
Elton Henry v. State, 2015 WY 156 (Wyo. 2015). “Our ruling was recapped at the end of the opinion as follows: "[We must apply our de novo standard of review to the issue before us because that issue requires our interpretation and application of a statute, We hold that Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-11-507 is clear and unambiguous;…”
— Wyo. Stat. § 7-11-507(a) — 5 cases
Christopher D. Balderson v. The State of Wyoming, 2013 WY 107 (Wyo. 2013). “19, § 1 (codified at Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-11-507 ). The statute provides as follows: (a) No judgment of conviction shall be entered upon a plea of guilty or nolo conten-dere to any charge which may result in the disqualification of the defendant to possess firearms pursuant to…”
Elton Henry v. State, 2015 WY 156 (Wyo. 2015). “Our ruling was recapped at the end of the opinion as follows: "[We must apply our de novo standard of review to the issue before us because that issue requires our interpretation and application of a statute, We hold that Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-11-507 is clear and unambiguous;…”
Robert J. Parks v. The State of Wyoming, 2014 WY 57 (Wyo. 2014). “" In his brief, Appellant contends his convictions should be reversed because he was not given the firearms advisement required by Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-11-507 . The State of Wyoming agrees.”
Blas Pedraza, Jr. v. The State of Wyoming, 2014 WY 24 (Wyo. 2014). “" In his briefs, Appellant contends that his convictions should be reversed because he was not given the firearms advisement required by Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-11-507 . The State of Wyoming agrees.”
Christopher D. Balderson v. The State of Wyoming, 2013 WY 107 (Wyo. 2013).
— Wyo. Stat. § 7-11-507(a)(i) — 3 cases
Taylor Forrest Cobb v. The State of Wyoming, 2013 WY 142 (Wyo. 2013).
Blas Pedraza, Jr. v. The State of Wyoming, 2014 WY 24 (Wyo. 2014). “" In his briefs, Appellant contends that his convictions should be reversed because he was not given the firearms advisement required by Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-11-507 . The State of Wyoming agrees.”
Robert Harry Turner, Sr. v. The State of Wyoming, 2014 WY 78 (Wyo. 2014).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.