Wyoming Statutes
Wyo. Stat. § 7-14-107 (2026)
Appellate review.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WY-LEGwyoleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Any final judgment or order entered upon a petition under this act may be reviewed by the supreme court on writ of certiorari upon the petition of either party pursuant to the Wyoming Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1985–2010 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Hopkinson v. Dist. Court, Teton Cnty., 696 P.2d 54 (Wyo. 1985).
State Ex Rel. Hopkinson v. Dist. Court, Teton Cnty., 696 P.2d 54 (Wyo. 1985). “This position is particularly applicable here where we have no original petition for writ of habeas corpus before us; no appeal lies from denial of such a petition by the district court; and an appeal from denial of a post-conviction petition for relief is specifically…”
Stogner v. State, 792 P.2d 1358 (Wyo. 1990). “Appeal was dismissed, calling attention to W.S. 7-14-107 (Cum.Supp. 1988), which provides that appellate review of post-conviction relief petitions must be sought by writ of certiorari.”
Duran v. State, 949 P.2d 885 (Wyo. 1997). “03(a) and Wyo. Stat. § 7-14-107 (1997). Even more fundamental to our decision on the post-conviction relief issue is Duran’s failure to mount an appeal, either from the judgment and sentence originally imposed or the amended judgment and sentence.”
Harlow v. State, 2004 WY 55 (Wyo. 2004). “Harlow, through counsel, intends to, and in fact did on May 11, 2004, timely file a Petition for Writ of Certiorari/Review pursuant to Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 7-14-107 (Lexis-Nexis 2003 and W.”
Smizer v. State, 763 P.2d 1254 (Wyo. 1988). “W.S. 7-14-107 provides that any final judgment or order entered upon a petition for post-conviction relief may be reviewed by the supreme court on writ of certiorari upon the petition of either party pursuant to the Wyoming Rules of Appellate Procedure.”
Skinner v. Abbott, 141 F. App'x 727 (10th Cir. 2005). “5 There *733 fore, since the Wyoming Supreme Court has never granted certiorari on collateral review of the issue, the state decisions which control our discussion as to Wyoming’s regular application of the procedural bar when shackling claims are raised for the first time in a…”
Stanton v. Wyoming Attorney Gen., 401 F. App'x 313 (10th Cir. 2010). “1988); Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-14-107 ; W.R.A.P. 13.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.