Code of Alabama
Ala. Code § 12-13-13 (2026)
Chief Clerk of Probate Court - Oath and Bond.
✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
The chief clerk of the probate court, before he enters upon his duties, must take the oath directed to be taken by the officers of this state and give bond, with surety, payable to the probate judge, in such sum as he may prescribe, upon which bond such clerk shall be liable to such judge inconsequence of any act of misfeasance or malfeasance of such chief clerk in the duties of his office, which bond must be approved by the probate judge and filed and recorded in the office of the clerk of the circuit court of the county.
(Code 1852, §674; Code 1867, §796; Code 1876, §702; Code 1886, §795; Code 1896, §§3372, 3373; Code 1907, §5430; Code 1923, §9593; Code 1940, T. 13, §301.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1995–2018 · leading case: Hosea O. Weaver & Sons, Inc. v. Towner, 663 So. 2d 892 (Ala. 1995).
Hosea O. Weaver & Sons, Inc. v. Towner, 663 So. 2d 892 (Ala. 1995). “, and Ala.Code 1975, § 12-13-13(a). Hosea Weaver argues that we should apply a less deferential standard of review, but we have reexamined our holding in our original opinion on this question, and we are not persuaded that we should apply a different standard of review in this…”
Bird v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., 705 So. 2d 363 (Ala. 1997). “, and § 12-13-13(a), Ala.Code 1975. When the trial judge's grounds for granting the motion for a new trial are not stated, as in this case, this Court applies this rule: "`When the trial court grants a motion for new trial, without specifying the grounds therefor, the ruling…”
Hunter v. Etowah Cnty. Court Referral Prog., LLC, 309 F. Supp. 3d 1154 (N.D. Ala. 2018). “Ala. Code § 12-13-13 (a) ; (g) (1975). "The period of probation or suspension may be continued, extended, or terminated.”
— Ala. Code § 12-13-13(a) — 2 cases
Hosea O. Weaver & Sons, Inc. v. Towner, 663 So. 2d 892 (Ala. 1995). “, and Ala.Code 1975, § 12-13-13(a). Hosea Weaver argues that we should apply a less deferential standard of review, but we have reexamined our holding in our original opinion on this question, and we are not persuaded that we should apply a different standard of review in this…”
Bird v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., 705 So. 2d 363 (Ala. 1997). “, and § 12-13-13(a), Ala.Code 1975. When the trial judge's grounds for granting the motion for a new trial are not stated, as in this case, this Court applies this rule: "`When the trial court grants a motion for new trial, without specifying the grounds therefor, the ruling…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.