Go Syfert / Research for Robots BETA

Plug your AI into a real law library

An AI can write you a handsome brief in ninety seconds. It can also invent a case that never existed, dress it in a confident citation, and let you file it. Lawyers have been sanctioned for exactly that. Listen: here is the fix. One URL connects Claude to this site's research stack, and from then on every citation your robot writes has to survive contact with ten million real cases before it reaches your desk.

Search everything.

Full-text search of 10.7 million opinions, every state and every federal court, ranked by authority.

Catch the fakes.

Every citation gets checked against the corpus: does it exist, and is it the case your robot says it is.

Know what is still good law.

Red, yellow, and green treatment flags, with the citing cases and the judges' own words behind each signal.

Know what a case stands for.

The propositions courts actually cite a case for, each flagged on its own. A case can be gold on one point and dead on another.

Audit the whole brief.

Every cite, every quoted passage, every claimed case name, one pass, before you file. Attack mode does the same thing to the other side's brief.

Statutes, everywhere.

All fifty states plus the U.S. Code, the C.F.R., the federal rules, and the sentencing guidelines.

Bluebook out of the box.

Citations come back formatted, court and year resolved, each case name linked to the full opinion on this site.

It works anywhere Claude does: claude.ai on the web, the desktop app, your phone, and Claude Code in a terminal. No software to install. You paste one URL into your Claude settings and your robot becomes a research assistant with library privileges.

Your research stays yours

After reviewing everything this server could keep, the only log it keeps of your legal research within the MCP is whether a tool call succeeded or failed — which tool ran, how long it took, and whether it errored. It does not record what you searched: not your search terms, not the parties or citations you checked, not the opinions you read. A running record of a lawyer's research is a dangerous thing for anyone to hold — so this machine doesn't hold it.
See the full toolset and pricing ▸

In beta. $