Code of Alabama
Ala. Code § 13A-10-124 (2026)
Tampering with a Witness.
✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
(a) A person commits the crime of tampering with a witness if he attempts to induce a witness or a person he believes will be called as a witness in any official proceeding to:
(1) Testify falsely or unlawfully withhold testimony; or
(2) Absent himself from any official proceeding to which he has been legally summoned.
(b) Tampering with a witness is a Class B misdemeanor.
(Acts 1977, No. 607, p. 812, §5020.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1998–2017 · leading case: Ivey v. State, 821 So. 2d 937 (Ala. 2001).
Ivey v. State, 821 So. 2d 937 (Ala. 2001). “Code 1975, and tampering with a witness, a violation of § 13A-10-124, Ala. Code 1975. On each count, he was sentenced to a term of six months' imprisonment and was fined $500.”
Trevioun Lamont Cornelius Briggs v. State of Mississippi, 226 So. 3d 59 (Miss. 2017). “Ala. Code Ann. § 13A-10-124. ¶17. In Ivey v.”
Hayes v. Alabama State Bar, 719 So. 2d 787 (Ala. 1998). “The indictment against Hayes consisted of five counts that alleged theft of property I, one count that alleged theft of property II, and one count that alleged intimidating a witness in violation of Ala.Code 1975, § 13A-10-124. The indictment against Carter consisted of five…”
State v. Gray, 258 P.3d 242 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011). “6 (2001) ("attempts to induce or otherwise cause”); Ala.Code § 13A-10-124 ("attempts to induce”); Alaska Stat.”
DecisionQuest, Inc. v. Hayes, 863 So. 2d 90 (Ala. 2003). “Hayes and Carter were each indicted on multiple counts of first-degree theft of property, one count of second-degree theft of property, and one count alleging that they had intimidated a witness, § 13A-10-124, Ala. Code 1975. On October 29, 1996, the late David Cromwell Johnson,…”
State of Arizona v. Ricky Gray (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011). “6 (2001) (“attempts to induce or otherwise cause”); Ala. Code § 13A-10-124 (“attempts to induce”); Alaska Stat.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.