(a) A person commits the crime of loitering if he or she does any of the following:
(1) Loiters, remains, or wanders about in a public place for the purpose of begging.
(2) Loiters or remains in a public place for the purpose of gambling.
(3) Loiters or remains in a public place for the purpose of engaging or soliciting another person to engage in prostitution or sodomy.
(4) Being masked, loiters, remains, or congregates in a public place.
(5) Loiters or remains in or about a school, college, or university building or grounds after having been told to leave by any authorized official of the school, college, or university, not having any reason or relationship involving custody of or responsibility for a pupil or any other specific, legitimate reason for being there, and not having written permission from a school, college, or university administrator.
(6) Loiters or remains in any transportation facility, unless specifically authorized to do so, for the purpose of soliciting or engaging in any business, trade, or commercial transactions involving the sale of merchandise or services.
(7) Loiters or remains in any place with one or more persons for the purpose of unlawfully using or possessing a dangerous drug.
(8) Loiters or remains on a public roadway maintained by the state, the right-of-way of a public roadway maintained by the state, or any area within 30 feet of any interchange involving a controlled-access or limited-access highway. An “interchange” is defined as a system of interconnecting roadways providing for traffic movement between two or more roadways that do not intersect at grade.
(b) A person does not commit a crime under subdivision (a)(4) if he or she is going to or from or staying at a masquerade party, or is participating in a public parade or presentation of an educational, religious, or historical character or in an event as defined in Section 13A-11-140.
(c) Sodomy in subdivision (a)(3) is defined as in Section 13A-6-60.
(d) Dangerous drug in subdivision (a)(7) means any narcotic, drug, or controlled substance as defined in Chapter 2 of Title 20 and any schedule incorporated therein.
(e) Loitering is a violation. A second or subsequent violation of this section in the same jurisdiction is a Class C misdemeanor.
(f)(1) Prior to making an arrest for a violation of subdivision (a)(8), a law enforcement officer may instruct any person in violation of subdivision (a)(8) to immediately and peaceably exit the public roadway maintained by the state or the right-of-way of the public roadway maintained by the state.
(2)a. Prior to making an arrest for an initial violation of subdivision (a)(8), a law enforcement officer may offer to transport any person in violation of subdivision (a)(8) to a location in the jurisdiction that offers emergency housing, if applicable.
b. If a person accepts an offer made pursuant to subdivision (1), a law enforcement officer may transport the person accordingly.
(g) Any actions undertaken by a law enforcement officer pursuant to this section shall be subject to Section 36-1-12.
(Acts 1977, No. 607, p. 812, §5540; Act 2019-465, §1; Act 2023-245, §1; Act 2024-326, §1.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
9
cases (
4 in the last 5 years), 1987–2025 · leading case:
State v. Berrill, 474 S.E.2d 508 (W. Va. 1996).
State v. Berrill, 474 S.E.2d 508 (W. Va. 1996).
“See Ala.Code § 13A-11-9 (1994); Cal.Penal Code § 185 (West 1988); Conn.”
Timmons v. City of Montgomery, Ala., 658 F. Supp. 1086 (M.D. Ala. 1987).
“For example, § 13A-11-9 provides: (a)A person commits the crime of loitering if he: (1) Loiters, remains or wanders about in a public place for the purpose of begging; or (2) Loiters or remains in a public place for the purpose of gambling; or (3) Loiters or remains in a public…”
Singleton v. Taylor (M.D. Ala. 2021).
· cites it 6× “contributions”) (hereinafter “the Solicitation Statute”).”
Bell v. Akins (N.D. Ala. 2022).
· cites it 5× “18-2 at 18); Ala. Code § 13A-11-9(a). The court’s consideration of “the need for the application of force, the relationship between the need and the amount of force used, and the extent of the injury inflicted” also weighs in favor of Mr.”
Singleton v. Taylor (M.D. Ala. 2020).
· cites it 4× “Plaintiffs and the City represent that they have reached a settlement agreement that resolves this dispute with respect to Plaintiffs’ claims against the City only.”
Singleton v. Taylor (M.D. Ala. 2020).
· cites it 4× “Plaintiffs and the City represent that they have reached a settlement agreement that resolves this dispute with respect to Plaintiffs’ claims against the City only.”
Singleton v. Taylor (M.D. Ala. 2021).
· cites it 3× “§ 1983 to challenge the constitutionality of two Alabama statutes: Alabama Code § 13A-11-9(a)(1) (prohibiting loitering “in a public place for the purpose of begging”) and Alabama Code § 32-5A-216(b) (prohibiting individuals from “stand[ing] on a highway for the purpose of…”
— Ala. Code § 13A-11-9(a) — 1 case
Bell v. Akins (N.D. Ala. 2022).
“18-2 at 18); Ala. Code § 13A-11-9(a). The court’s consideration of “the need for the application of force, the relationship between the need and the amount of force used, and the extent of the injury inflicted” also weighs in favor of Mr.”
— Ala. Code § 13A-11-9(a)(1) — 5 cases
Singleton v. Taylor (M.D. Ala. 2021).
“contributions”) (hereinafter “the Solicitation Statute”).”
Singleton v. Taylor (M.D. Ala. 2020).
“Plaintiffs and the City represent that they have reached a settlement agreement that resolves this dispute with respect to Plaintiffs’ claims against the City only.”
Singleton v. Taylor (M.D. Ala. 2020).
“Plaintiffs and the City represent that they have reached a settlement agreement that resolves this dispute with respect to Plaintiffs’ claims against the City only.”
Singleton v. Taylor (M.D. Ala. 2021).
“§ 1983 to challenge the constitutionality of two Alabama statutes: Alabama Code § 13A-11-9(a)(1) (prohibiting loitering “in a public place for the purpose of begging”) and Alabama Code § 32-5A-216(b) (prohibiting individuals from “stand[ing] on a highway for the purpose of…”
— Ala. Code § 13A-11-9(a)(4) — 1 case
— Ala. Code § 13A-11-9(e) — 1 case
Bell v. Akins (N.D. Ala. 2022).
“18-2 at 18); Ala. Code § 13A-11-9(a). The court’s consideration of “the need for the application of force, the relationship between the need and the amount of force used, and the extent of the injury inflicted” also weighs in favor of Mr.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.