Code of Alabama

Ala. Code § 14-9-41 (2026)

Computation of Correctional Incentive Time Deductions; Reporting Requirements.

✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaAla. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Except as provided in subsection (e), each prisoner who is convicted of any offense against the laws of the State of Alabama and is confined, in execution of the judgment or sentence upon any conviction, in the penitentiary, or at hard labor for the county jail, or in any municipal jail for a definite or indeterminate term, whose record of conduct shows that he or she has faithfully observed the rules for a period of time to be specified by this article, may earn a deduction from the term of his or her sentence as follows:

(1) Thirty days for each 30 days actually served while the prisoner is classified as a Class I prisoner.

(2) Fifteen days for each 30 days actually served while the prisoner is a Class II prisoner.

(3) Five days for each 30 days actually served while the prisoner is a Class III prisoner.

(4) No correctional incentive time shall accrue during the period the prisoner is classified as a Class IV prisoner.

(b) Within 90 days after May 19, 1980, the Commissioner of the Department of Corrections shall establish and publish in appropriate directives certain criteria not in conflict with this article for Class I, II, III, and IV prisoner classifications. The classifications shall encompass consideration of the prisoner’s behavior, discipline, and work practices and job responsibilities.

(c)(1) Class I includes prisoners who are considered to be trustworthy in every respect and who, by virtue of their work habits, conduct, and attitude of cooperation have proven their trustworthiness. An example of a Class I inmate would be one who could work without constant supervision by a security officer.

(2) Class II includes prisoners whose jobs will be under the supervision of a correctional employee at all times. Any inmate shall remain in this classification for a minimum period of 12 months before being eligible for Class I.

(3) Class III includes prisoners with special assignments. They may not receive any of the privileges of Class I and Class II prisoners. A prisoner shall remain in this classification for a minimum period of six months before being eligible for Class II.

(4) Class IV includes prisoners not yet classified, including all incoming prisoners, prisoners who are able to work and refuse, prisoners who commit disciplinary infractions that do not warrant a higher classification, and prisoners who do not abide by the rules of the institution. Prisoners who are classified in this earning class receive no correctional incentive time. This class is generally referred to as “flat time” or “day-for-day.” A prisoner shall remain in this classification for a minimum period of three months before being eligible for Class III.

(5) No prisoner may reach any class without first having gone through and meeting the requirements of all lower classifications.

(d) As a prisoner gains a higher classification status he or she shall not be granted retroactive correctional incentive time based on the higher classification he or she has reached, but shall only be granted correctional incentive time based on the classification in which he or she was serving at the time the correctional incentive time was earned. Nothing in this article authorizes a prisoner to receive correctional incentive time based on the highest classification he or she attains for any period of time in which he or she was serving in a lower classification or from the date of his or her sentence.

(e)(1) No prisoner may receive correctional incentive time under any of the following circumstances:

a. He or she has been convicted of a Class A felony.

b. He or she has been convicted of any crime that caused the death of another person by means of a deadly weapon, as defined in Section 13A-1-2.

c. He or she has been sentenced to life, sentenced to death, or has received a sentence for more than 15 years.

d. He or she has been convicted of a sex offense involving a child, as defined in Section 15-20A-4.

(2)a. No prisoner may be placed in Class I under any of the following circumstances:

1. He or she has been convicted of an assault where the victims of the assault suffered the permanent loss or use or permanent partial loss or use of any bodily organ or appendage.

2. He or she has been convicted of a crime involving the perpetration of sexual abuse upon the person of a child under the age of 17 years.

3. He or she has been convicted of a Class B felony that is a violent offense, as defined in Section 12-25-32.

b. The court sentencing a person shall note on the transcript accompanying the prisoner that he or she has been sentenced to a crime that forbids his or her being classified as a Class I prisoner.

(f)(1) If, during the term of imprisonment, a prisoner commits an offense or violates a rule of the Department of Corrections, all or any part of his or her correctional incentive time accrued pursuant to this section shall be forfeited.

(2)a. The Commissioner of the Department of Corrections may restore any portion of the correctional incentive time that has been forfeited by a prisoner for violating any existing law or department rule or regulation, as the commissioner deems proper, upon recommendation and evidence provided by the warden in charge.

b. This subdivision shall not apply to prisoners who commit or attempt to commit violations provided in subdivision (3).

(3) If, during the term of imprisonment, a prisoner commits or attempts to commit by any overt act toward the commission of any of the following violations, as defined by the department’s Administrative Regulation Number 403 as of January 1, 2023, he or she may no longer receive correctional incentive time for the term of imprisonment and shall forfeit all of his or her correctional incentive time accrued pursuant to this section:

a. Homicide.

b. Escape.

c. Assault that causes serious physical injury, excluding when used in self-defense, as determined by the department.

d. Seizing or holding a hostage in any manner.

e. Sexual assault.

f. Inciting a riot.

g. Rioting, excluding civil protests.

h. Fighting with a weapon resulting in serious physical injury.

i. Arson.

(g)(1) For prisoners receiving correctional incentive time, the term of supervision required pursuant to Section 15-22-26.2, shall not further reduce the term of imprisonment except where the minimum required term of supervision would exceed the correctional incentive time accrued.

(2) When a prisoner is serving two or more terms of imprisonment and the sentences run consecutively, all sentences shall be combined for the purpose of computing deductions for correctional incentive time and release date. The actual deduction from sentence for correctional incentive time provided by this section shall apply only to sentences to be served.

(3) When a prisoner is serving two or more sentences that run concurrently, the sentence that results in the longer period of incarceration shall be used for the purpose of computing deductions for correctional incentive time and release date. When computing the deductions allowed in this section on indeterminate sentences, the maximum sentence shall be the basis for the computation.

(h) This section shall be administered by the chief administrative officer of the penal institution as it applies to prisoners in any state penal institution, by the sheriff of the county as it applies to prisoners in any county jail, and by the chief of police as it applies to prisoners in any municipal jail.

(i) Deductions for good behavior, work habits and cooperation, or good conduct shall be interpreted to give authorized correctional incentive time retroactively to those offenders convicted of crimes committed after May 19, 1980, except those convicted of crimes of the unlawful sale or distribution of controlled substances as enumerated in Article 5 of Chapter 12 of Title 13A and for any sex offenses as enumerated in Articles 4 and 4A of Chapter 6 of Title 13A. The commissioner shall have the prison records of all prisoners who become eligible under this article reviewed and shall disqualify any prisoner from being awarded correctional incentive time under this article at his or her discretion.

(j) The Department of Corrections, by February 15 of each year, shall submit to the Legislature, the Governor, and the Attorney General a report including all of the following:

(1) The number of prisoners in each classification.

(2) The number of prisoners who changed classifications.

(3) The number of prisoners who had their correctional incentive time forfeited based on a high level violation, as provided by department guidelines, including the specific kind and number of the high level violation for each prisoner.

(4) The number of prisoners who had their correction incentive time forfeited based on a violation of subdivision (f)(3), including the cumulative number of days that were forfeited.

(k) All amendatory language added to this section by Act 2023-22 regarding the calculation as to correctional incentive time, added pursuant to the act shall be applied prospectively, and any adjustment to that time shall only apply to violations committed after April 14, 2023. Act 2023-22 shall supersede any policy, procedure, or rule in place on April 14, 2023, with exception of the Department of Corrections’ Administrative Regulation Number 403.

(Acts 1980, No. 80-446, p. 690, §2; Acts 1991, No. 91-637, p. 1201, §1; Act 2005-301, 1st Sp. Sess., p. 571, §1; Act 2015-463, p. 1506, §1; Act 2022-322, §2; Act 2023-22, §§ 2,3.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 51 cases (10 in the last 5 years), 1983–2026 · leading case: Hayward v. Marshall, 603 F.3d 546 (9th Cir. 2010).
Hayward v. Marshall, 603 F.3d 546 (9th Cir. 2010). · cites it 2× “01; Kan. Stat. Ann. §§ 21-4706 , -4722; La.”
Shelly v. Alabama Dep't of Corr., 109 So. 3d 1145 (Ala. Crim. App. 2012). · cites it 42× “) As the Department recognized in its pleadings below, under § 14-9-41, Ala.Code 1975 (“the Act”), Shelly is generally “entitled to earn a deduction from the term of his sentence” because he is serving a term of imprisonment of 15 years or less, and because he has not been…”
D.L.S. v. State, 675 So. 2d 1363 (Ala. Crim. App. 1995). · cites it 13× “” The appellant maintains that the legislature did not intend for this provision of § 14-9-41 (e) to apply to the crime of incest, but instead intended for the provision to apply only to those crimes designated as “sexual offenses” in chapter 6, article 4, of the Criminal Code,…”
Collins v. Alabama Dept. of Corr., 911 So. 2d 739 (Ala. Crim. App. 2004). · cites it 4× “We agree with the determination of the Court of Criminal Appeals, relying on Ala.Code 1975, § 14-9-41, Coslett v. State, 697 So.”
Charlie Stith v. State of Alabama., 76 So. 3d 286 (Ala. Crim. App. 2011). · cites it 6× “In his petition, Stith claimed that his trial counsel was ineffective in rendering advice regarding the collateral effects of a guilty plea in the following respects: (A) Stith’s counsel failed to inform him that he would not be eligible for “good time” with regard to his prison…”
Jacobs v. Alabama Dept. of Corr., 900 So. 2d 485 (Ala. Crim. App. 2004). · cites it 3× “We agree with the determination of the Court of Criminal Appeals, relying on Ala.Code 1975, § 14-9-41, Coslett v. State, 697 So.”
Block v. Alabama Dept. of Corr., 923 So. 2d 342 (Ala. Crim. App. 2005). · cites it 3× “We agree with the determination of the Court of Criminal Appeals, relying on Ala.Code 1975, § 14-9-41, Coslett v. State, 697 So.”
Harold Clarence Frost v. State of Alabama., 76 So. 3d 862 (Ala. Crim. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “In Stith , Stith alleged in his Rule 32 petition that trial counsel failed to inform him that he would be ineligible to receive correctional incentive time as provided for in § 14-9-41, Ala.Code 1975, with regard to his prison sentence if he pleaded guilty to first-degree…”
Fuqua v. State, 910 So. 2d 141 (Ala. Crim. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “It is clear from reading § 14-9-41 et seq. that the provisions of that article do not refer to the time that a convicted person has spent incarcerated pending trial as discussed in § 15-18-5.”
Montgomery v. State, 967 So. 2d 103 (Ala. Crim. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “” § 14-9-41(g)(2), Ala.Code 1975. In Morrison v.”
Leonard Earl Thornton v. Guy Hunt, Receiver of Alabama Prison Sys., in His Off. Capacity Fred R. Smith, & Attorney Gen. Don Siegelman, 852 F.2d 526 (11th Cir. 1988). “§ 1983 , Thornton alleged that the Alabama Correctional Incentive Time Act (ACITA), Ala.Code § 14-9-41(e), violated the equal protection clause and the due process clause of the United States Constitution.”
Hilsabeck v. State, 477 So. 2d 465 (Ala. Crim. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “Acts 80-446 [now codified at § 14-9-41, Code of Alabama (Supp. 1982) ], violates state constitutional requirements for passage of legislation or federal and state equal protection and due process guarantees.”
— Ala. Code § 14-9-41(a) — 4 cases
Cox v. State, 548 So. 2d 1099 (Ala. Crim. App. 1989).
Bell v. State, 665 So. 2d 1029 (Ala. Crim. App. 1995).
Corley v. State, 988 So. 2d 593 (Ala. Crim. App. 2007).
— Ala. Code § 14-9-41(a)(l) — 2 cases
Shelly v. Alabama Dep't of Corr., 109 So. 3d 1145 (Ala. Crim. App. 2012). “) As the Department recognized in its pleadings below, under § 14-9-41, Ala.Code 1975 (“the Act”), Shelly is generally “entitled to earn a deduction from the term of his sentence” because he is serving a term of imprisonment of 15 years or less, and because he has not been…”
Powers v. State, 546 So. 2d 1000 (Ala. Crim. App. 1987).
— Ala. Code § 14-9-41(e) — 17 cases
Shelly v. Alabama Dep't of Corr., 109 So. 3d 1145 (Ala. Crim. App. 2012). “) As the Department recognized in its pleadings below, under § 14-9-41, Ala.Code 1975 (“the Act”), Shelly is generally “entitled to earn a deduction from the term of his sentence” because he is serving a term of imprisonment of 15 years or less, and because he has not been…”
D.L.S. v. State, 675 So. 2d 1363 (Ala. Crim. App. 1995). “” The appellant maintains that the legislature did not intend for this provision of § 14-9-41 (e) to apply to the crime of incest, but instead intended for the provision to apply only to those crimes designated as “sexual offenses” in chapter 6, article 4, of the Criminal Code,…”
Charlie Stith v. State of Alabama., 76 So. 3d 286 (Ala. Crim. App. 2011). “In his petition, Stith claimed that his trial counsel was ineffective in rendering advice regarding the collateral effects of a guilty plea in the following respects: (A) Stith’s counsel failed to inform him that he would not be eligible for “good time” with regard to his prison…”
Leonard Earl Thornton v. Guy Hunt, Receiver of Alabama Prison Sys., in His Off. Capacity Fred R. Smith, & Attorney Gen. Don Siegelman, 852 F.2d 526 (11th Cir. 1988). “§ 1983 , Thornton alleged that the Alabama Correctional Incentive Time Act (ACITA), Ala.Code § 14-9-41(e), violated the equal protection clause and the due process clause of the United States Constitution.”
Cox v. State, 548 So. 2d 1099 (Ala. Crim. App. 1989).
— Ala. Code § 14-9-41(e)(1) — 1 case
— Ala. Code § 14-9-41(e)(1)(c) — 1 case
— Ala. Code § 14-9-41(f)(1) — 2 cases
— Ala. Code § 14-9-41(f)(l) — 1 case
Gibson v. State, 471 So. 2d 440 (Ala. Crim. App. 1983).
— Ala. Code § 14-9-41(g)(2) — 2 cases
Montgomery v. State, 967 So. 2d 103 (Ala. Crim. App. 2007). “” § 14-9-41(g)(2), Ala.Code 1975. In Morrison v.”
Corley v. State, 988 So. 2d 593 (Ala. Crim. App. 2007).
— Ala. Code § 14-9-41(g)(3) — 1 case
Burrell (M.D. Ala. 2026).
— Ala. Code § 14-9-41(h) — 4 cases
D.L.S. v. State, 675 So. 2d 1363 (Ala. Crim. App. 1995). “” The appellant maintains that the legislature did not intend for this provision of § 14-9-41 (e) to apply to the crime of incest, but instead intended for the provision to apply only to those crimes designated as “sexual offenses” in chapter 6, article 4, of the Criminal Code,…”
Dortch v. State, 654 So. 2d 105 (Ala. Crim. App. 1995).
Grimsley v. State, 645 So. 2d 370 (Ala. Crim. App. 1994).
Bell v. State, 665 So. 2d 1029 (Ala. Crim. App. 1995).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.