Code of Alabama

Ala. Code § 15-6-21 (2026)

Arrest Warrant.

✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaAla. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) If on examination by the circuit, district or municipal court judge, it appears that there is reason to fear the commission of any offense by the person complained of, such judge must issue a warrant directed to any lawful officer of the state, containing the substance of the complaint and commanding such officer forthwith to arrest the person complained of and bring him before him or some other judge having jurisdiction of the matter.

(b) The warrant may be after the following form:

“State of Alabama,

__________ County.

To any lawful officer of the state:

Complaint on oath having been made before me that C. D. had threatened to assault and beat A. B. (or is about) to (here set forth particularly the offense threatened or about to be committed) on the person or property of ______, you are hereby commanded forthwith to arrest said C. D. and bring him before me (or some other judge having jurisdiction of the matter, setting forth his name and office).

Dated the _____ day of _____, 20__.

(c) Such warrant may be executed by the sheriff or other officer acting as sheriff, his deputy or any constable of the county or by any marshal or policeman of any incorporated city or town in the county.

(Code 1852, §§410, 411; Code 1867, §§3959, 3960; Code 1876, §§4028, 4029; Code 1886, §§4682, 4683; Code 1896, §§5163, 5164; Code 1907, §§7522-7524; Code 1923, §§5140-5142; Code 1940, T. 15, §§403-405.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1984–1984 · leading case: Love v. State, 455 So. 2d 96 (Ala. Crim. App. 1984).
Love v. State, 455 So. 2d 96 (Ala. Crim. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “” Our review of all the transcript of the proceedings tends to convince us that there is considerable merit in appellant’s contention that there was reasonable ground to doubt defendant’s sanity and that it would have been advisable for the trial of the case to have been…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.