Ala. Code
Code of Alabama

Ala. Code § 17-13-100 (2026)

When Held; Reimbursement of County.

✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaAla. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Primary elections for the purpose of determining the preferred candidates for President of the United States shall be held the first Tuesday in March each year in which a President is to be elected beginning in the year 2016.

(b) Subject to rules and procedures of the political party of any presidential candidate, the names of any candidates for delegate to the national conventions pledged to a presidential candidate shall be placed under his or her name and the delegates shall be elected in the primary election as provided herein.

(c) The State of Alabama shall reimburse a county for all sums expended in holding and conducting the presidential preference primary as provided in Section 17-16-4.

(Acts 1978, No. 691, p. 994, §1; Acts 1979, No. 79-547, p. 994, §1; Code 1975, §17-18A-1; Acts 1990, No. 90-699, p. 1359, §1; Act 2006-634, p. 1731, §1; §17-16A-1; amended and renumbered by Act 2006-570, p. 1331, §65; Act 2007-461, p. 965, §3; Act 2011-566, p. 1142, §1; Act 2015-239, §1.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2008–2008 · leading case: Working v. Jefferson Cnty. Election Comm'n, 2 So. 3d 827 (Ala. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Working v. Jefferson Cnty. Election Comm'n, 2 So. 3d 827 (Ala. 2008). “” See § 17-13-100(d) (providing that the State of Alabama’s obligation to reimburse a county for sums expended in holding and conducting a presidential-preference primary shall be “as provided in Section 17-16-4”).”
— Ala. Code § 17-13-100(d) — 1 case
Working v. Jefferson Cnty. Election Comm'n, 2 So. 3d 827 (Ala. 2008). “” See § 17-13-100(d) (providing that the State of Alabama’s obligation to reimburse a county for sums expended in holding and conducting a presidential-preference primary shall be “as provided in Section 17-16-4”).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.