Code of Alabama

Ala. Code § 25-1-28 (2026)

Unlawful Employment Practices - Opposition to Employer.

✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaAla. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

It is an unlawful employment practice for an employer, labor organization, employment agency, or joint labor-management committee to discriminate against an individual because that individual has opposed any practice which is an unlawful employment practice under this article, or because that individual has made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under this article.

(Acts 1997, No. 97-723, p. 1495, §9.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2001–2022 · leading case: Bonham v. Regions Mortg., Inc., 129 F. Supp. 2d 1315 (M.D. Ala. 2001).
Bonham v. Regions Mortg., Inc., 129 F. Supp. 2d 1315 (M.D. Ala. 2001). · cites it 3× “” 1975 Ala.Code § 25-1-28. Thus, the ADEA would prohibit Regions from retaliating against Bonham because she filed an EEOC charge, and both the ADEA and the AADEA would prohibit Regions from retaliating against Bonham because she filed this lawsuit.”
Johnson v. La Petite Academy, Inc. (N.D. Ala. 2020). · cites it 2× “§ 623 (d); Ala. Code § 25-1-28 . The analytical framework that applies to Title VII retaliation claims also applies to retaliation claims brought under the ADEA and the AADEA.”
Brown v. Mercedes-Benz US Int'l Inc (N.D. Ala. 2022). “Code § 25-1-28 . To establish a prima facie case of retaliation under Title VII, § 1981, the ADEA or the AADEA, Brown must prove: (1) she engaged in statutorily protected conduct; (2) she suffered an adverse employment action; and (3) the adverse action was causally related to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.