(a) To the full extent permitted by the constitution and as permitted under Article 2 of Chapter 2B of this title, the court has jurisdiction over all subject matter relating to estates of protected persons and protection of minors and incapacitated persons.
(b) The court has full power to make order, judgments, and decrees and take all other action necessary and proper to administer justice in the matters that come before it.
(c) The court has jurisdiction over protective proceedings and guardianship proceedings.
(d) If both guardianship and protective proceedings as to the same person are commenced or pending in the same court, the proceedings may be consolidated.
(e) No provision of this chapter shall be construed to void, abate, or diminish the powers or equity jurisdiction, when invoked, heretofore or hereafter granted by statute to certain probate courts.
(Acts 1987, No. 87-590, p. 975, §1-302; Act 2010-500, p. 782, §2.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
6
cases (
2 in the last 5 years), 2010–2025 · leading case:
Ex Parte L.E.O., 61 So. 3d 1042 (Ala. 2010).
Ex Parte L.E.O., 61 So. 3d 1042 (Ala. 2010).
· cites it 2× “In addition, the understanding expressed in the main opinion of what constitutes a "dependent child" creates an unnecessary jurisdictional conflict between the juvenile court and the probate court, which has jurisdiction in certain cases concerning the "protection of minors,”…”
Casey v. Casey, 88 So. 3d 822 (Ala. 2012).
· cites it 4× “See Ala.Code 1975, § 26-2A-31. The filing of a petition that raises the possibility of the necessity for the appointment of a guardian or conservator, however, is not the equivalent of creating a guardianship or conservatorship that must be "administ[ered] or conduct[ed].”
Hoff v. Goyer, 160 So. 3d 768 (Ala. Civ. App. 2014).
· cites it 2× “” Thus, under § 26-2A-31, the probate court had concurrent jurisdiction with the circuit court over such matters.”
Beam v. Taylor, 149 So. 3d 571 (Ala. 2014).
“I further point out that the Comment to § 26-2A-31, Ala.Code 1975, setting out subject-matter jurisdiction of the Act, states that “[t]he subject matter jurisdiction described in this section affects the jurisdiction of the probate court only insofar as it applies to proceedings…”
— Ala. Code § 26-2A-31(a) — 3 cases
Casey v. Casey, 88 So. 3d 822 (Ala. 2012).
“See Ala.Code 1975, § 26-2A-31. The filing of a petition that raises the possibility of the necessity for the appointment of a guardian or conservator, however, is not the equivalent of creating a guardianship or conservatorship that must be "administ[ered] or conduct[ed].”
Hoff v. Goyer, 160 So. 3d 768 (Ala. Civ. App. 2014).
“” Thus, under § 26-2A-31, the probate court had concurrent jurisdiction with the circuit court over such matters.”
— Ala. Code § 26-2A-31(b) — 1 case
— Ala. Code § 26-2A-31(c) — 1 case
— Ala. Code § 26-2A-31(e) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.