Code of Alabama
Ala. Code § 28-6-1 (2026)
Definitions.
✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
Repealed by Act 2001-1114, 4th Sp. Sess., p. 1179, § 1, effective September 30, 2001.
(Acts 1979, No. 79-182, p. 291, §1; Act 98-505, §1.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 2003–2018 · leading case: Stiff v. Alabama Alcoholic Bev. Control Bd., 878 So. 2d 1138 (Ala. 2003).
Stiff v. Alabama Alcoholic Bev. Control Bd., 878 So. 2d 1138 (Ala. 2003). “In 1979, the Legislature passed the "Native Farm Winery Act," § 28-6-1 et seq., Ala.Code 1975. [3] The Native Farm Winery Act levied an excise tax of $.”
Town of Cedar Bluff v. Citizens Caring for Child., 904 So. 2d 1253 (Ala. 2004). “2003), a party challenged the constitutionality of Alabama's Native Farm Winery Act, § 28-6-1 et seq., Ala.Code 1975. In that case, this Court effectively restated the standard articulated in Jones , using language adopted from the Supreme Court of the United States: "A party…”
State ex rel. Alabama Policy Inst., 200 So. 3d 495 (Ala. 2015). “2003), a party challenged the constitutionality of Alabama’s Native Farm Winery Act, § 28-6-1 et seq., Ala.Code 1975. In that case, this Court effectively restated the standard articulated in Jones , using language adopted from the Supreme Court of the United States: “A party…”
Poiroux v. Rich, 150 So. 3d 1027 (Ala. 2014). “2003), a party challenged the constitutionality of Alabama’s Native Farm Winery Act, § 28-6-1 et seq., Ala.Code 1975. In that case, this Court effectively restated the standard articulated in Jones, using language adopted from the Supreme Court of the United States: “‘A party…”
Ingle v. Adkins, 256 So. 3d 62 (Ala. 2017). “2003), a party challenged the constitutionality of Alabama's Native Farm Winery Act, § 28-6-1 et seq., Ala. Code 1975. In that case, this Court effectively restated the standard articulated in Jones , using language adopted from the Supreme Court of the United States: " 'A party…”
Gann v. City of Gulf Shores, 29 So. 3d 244 (Ala. Crim. App. 2009). “2003), a party challenged the constitutionality of Alabama’s Native Farm Winery Act, § 28-6-1 et seq., Ala.Code 1975. In that case, this court effectively restated the standard articulated in Jones , using language adopted from the Supreme Coui’t of the United States: “ A party…”
Richardson v. Relf, 265 So. 3d 236 (Ala. 2018). “2003), a party challenged the constitutionality of Alabama's Native Farm Winery Act, § 28-6-1 et seq., Ala. Code 1975. In that case, this Court effectively restated the standard articulated in *243 Jones [v.”
Richardson v. Relf, 265 So. 3d 236 (Ala. 2018). “2003), a party challenged the constitutionality of Alabama's Native Farm Winery Act, § 28-6-1 et seq., Ala. Code 1975. In that case, this Court effectively restated the standard articulated in *243 Jones [v.”
— Ala. Code § 28-6-1(1) — 1 case
Stiff v. Alabama Alcoholic Bev. Control Bd., 878 So. 2d 1138 (Ala. 2003). “In 1979, the Legislature passed the "Native Farm Winery Act," § 28-6-1 et seq., Ala.Code 1975. [3] The Native Farm Winery Act levied an excise tax of $.”
— Ala. Code § 28-6-1(2) — 1 case
Stiff v. Alabama Alcoholic Bev. Control Bd., 878 So. 2d 1138 (Ala. 2003). “In 1979, the Legislature passed the "Native Farm Winery Act," § 28-6-1 et seq., Ala.Code 1975. [3] The Native Farm Winery Act levied an excise tax of $.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.