Code of Alabama

Ala. Code § 32-5-222 (2026)

Requirements for Child Passenger Restraints.

✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaAla. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Every person transporting a child in a motor vehicle operated on the roadways, streets, or highways of this state, shall provide for the protection of the child by properly using an aftermarket or integrated child passenger restraint system meeting applicable federal motor vehicle safety standards and the requirements of subsection (b). This section shall not be interpreted to release in part or in whole the responsibility of an automobile manufacturer to insure the safety of children to a level at least equivalent to existing federal safety standards for adults. In no event shall failure to wear a child passenger restraint system be considered as contributory negligence. The term “motor vehicle” as used in this section shall include a passenger car, pickup truck, van (seating capacity of 10 or less), minivan, or sports utility vehicle.

(b) The size appropriate restraint system required for a child in subsection (a) must meet the requirements of Section 32-5B-4 and shall include all of the following:

(1) Infant only seats and convertible seats used in the rear facing position for infants until at least one year of age or 20 pounds.

(2) Convertible seats in the forward position or forward facing seats until the child is at least five years of age or 40 pounds.

(3) Booster seats until the child is six years of age.

(4) Seat belts until 15 years of age.

(c) No provision of this section shall be construed as creating any duty, standard of care, right, or liability between parent and child that is not recognized under the laws of the State of Alabama as they presently exist, or may, at any time in the future, be constituted by statute or decision.

(d) Any person violating the provisions of this section may be fined twenty-five dollars ($25) for each offense. The charges may be dismissed by the trial judge hearing the case and no court costs shall be assessed upon proof of acquisition of an appropriate child passenger restraint.

(e) Fifteen dollars ($15) of a fine imposed under subsection (d) shall be used to distribute vouchers for size appropriate child passenger restraint systems to families of limited income in the state. The fifteen dollars ($15) shall be deposited in the State Treasury to be distributed by the state Comptroller to the Department of Public Health, which shall administer the program free of charge.

(f) The provisions of this section notwithstanding, nothing contained herein shall be deemed a violation of any law which would otherwise nullify or change in any way the provisions or coverage of any insurance contract.

(g) For the purpose of identifying habitually negligent drivers and habitual or frequent violators, the Department of Public Safety shall assess the following points:

(1) Violation of child safety restraint requirements, first offense ......................1 point.

(2) Violation of child safety restraint requirements, second or subsequent offense .............2 points.

(h) Every person transporting a child shall be responsible for assuring that each child is properly restrained pursuant to this section. The provisions shall not apply to taxis and all motor vehicles with a seating capacity of 11 or more passengers.

(i) Each state, county, and municipal police department shall maintain statistical information on traffic stops of minorities pursuant to this section, and shall report that information monthly to the Department of Public Safety and the Office of the Attorney General.

(Acts 1982, No. 82-421, p. 663; Acts 1989, No. 89-781, p. 1562, §1; Act 2006-623, p. 1704, §1; Act 2014-300, p. 1092, §1.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1986–2010 · leading case: E.H.G. v. E.R.G., 73 So. 3d 614 (Ala. Civ. App. 2010).
E.H.G. v. E.R.G., 73 So. 3d 614 (Ala. Civ. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “Ala.Code 1975, § 32-5-222. State law authorizes the removal of a child from the home of a parent when parental conduct threatens the health or safety of the child, Ala.”
L.B.S. v. L.M.S., 826 So. 2d 178 (Ala. Civ. App. 2002). “Examples of permissible interference with parental control include requiring child-passenger restraints for children under the age of six (§ 32-5-222, Ala.Code 1975); requiring children to wear bicycle helmets while riding a bicycle (§ 32-5A-285, Ala.”
Madaris v. State of Oregon High. Div., 723 P.2d 1054 (Or. Ct. App. 1986). “…in those states forbids the use of evidence of failure to wear a seat belt for purposes of mitigating damages. 6 See Ala Code § 32-5-222; Ariz Rev Stat Ann § 28-907; Ark Stat Ann § 75-2606; Del Code Ann tit 21, § 4199 C; Fla Stat § 316.613(3); Idaho Code § 49-763 (3); Md…”
Lbs v. Lms, 826 So. 2d 178 (Ala. Civ. App. 2002). “Examples of permissible interference with parental control include requiring child-passenger restraints for children under the age of six (§ 32-5-222, Ala.Code 1975); requiring children to wear bicycle helmets while riding a bicycle (§ 32-5A-285, Ala.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.