This chapter does not apply to or affect any of the following:
(1) A lien given by statute or rule of law to a supplier of services or materials for the vehicle.
(2) A lien given by statute to the United States, this state, or any political subdivision of this state.
(3) A security interest in a vehicle created by a manufacturer or dealer who holds the vehicle for sale, but a buyer in the ordinary course of trade from the manufacturer or dealer takes title free of the security interest.
(4) A lien on a utility trailer exempted under this chapter when the lien was created or established on or after January 1, 2004.
(5) A lien on a manufactured home exempted under this chapter when the lien was created or established on or after January 1, 2010.
(Acts 1973, No. 765, p. 1147, §18; Act 2003-345, p. 870, §1; Act 2009-746, p. 2236, §2.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
3
cases, 2000–2020 · leading case:
In Re Davis, 269 B.R. 914 (Bankr. M.D. Ala. 2001).
In Re Davis, 269 B.R. 914 (Bankr. M.D. Ala. 2001).
· cites it 9× “Alabama Code § 32-8-60, provides as follows: This chapter does not apply to or affect: (1) A lien given by statute or rule of law to a supplier of services or materials for the vehicle; (2) A lien given by statute to the United States, this state or any political subdivision of…”
Greene v. Assocs. (In Re Green), 248 B.R. 583 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. 2000).
· cites it 2× “” Under Ala. Code §§ 32-8-60 et seq., it is a security interest which if not perfected as specified is “not valid against creditors of the owner or subsequent transferees or lien-holders of the vehicle .”
Carden v. Ditech Fin., LLC (Bankr. N.D. Ala. 2020).
· cites it 4× “, with § 32-8-60, et seq.). In fact, security interests previously perfected under Chapter 8 are expressly recognized as retaining their validity and priority under the MHT Act: “[A] security interest in a manufactured home for which a certificate of title is required by the…”
— Ala. Code § 32-8-60(5) — 1 case
Carden v. Ditech Fin., LLC (Bankr. N.D. Ala. 2020).
“, with § 32-8-60, et seq.). In fact, security interests previously perfected under Chapter 8 are expressly recognized as retaining their validity and priority under the MHT Act: “[A] security interest in a manufactured home for which a certificate of title is required by the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.