Code of Alabama

Ala. Code § 32-8-86 (2026)

Removed, Falsified or Unauthorized Identification Number, Registration or License Plate; Seizure of Vehicle, Part, Etc., When Number Altered, Etc.; Disposition of Forfeited Property.

✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaAla. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) A person who willfully removes or falsifies an identification number of a vehicle, engine, transmission or other identifiable component part of a vehicle is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor and shall be punished as required by law.

(b) A person who, willfully and with intent to conceal or misrepresent the identity of a vehicle, engine, transmission or other identifiable component part of a vehicle or removes or falsifies an identification number of the same is guilty of a Class C felony and shall be punished as required by law.

(c) A person who buys, receives, possesses, sells or disposes of a vehicle, or an engine, transmission or other identifiable component part of a vehicle, knowing that an identification number of the same has been removed or falsified, is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor and shall be punished as required by law.

(d) A person who buys, receives, possesses, sells or disposes of a vehicle, engine, transmission or other identifiable component part of a vehicle, with knowledge that an identification number of same has been removed or falsified and with intent to conceal or misrepresent the identity of same is guilty of a Class C felony and shall be punished as required by law.

(e) A person who removes a license plate or tag from a vehicle or affixes to a vehicle a license plate or tag not authorized by law for use on it, in either case with intent to conceal or misrepresent the identity of a vehicle or its owner, is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor and shall be punished as required by law.

(f) As used in this section:

(1) IDENTIFICATION NUMBER. Such term includes an identifying number, serial number, engine number or other distinguishing number or mark placed on a vehicle, engine, transmission or other component part of a vehicle, by its manufacturer or by authority of the department or in accordance with the laws of another state or country.

(2) REMOVE. Such term includes deface, cover and destroy.

(3) FALSIFY. Such term includes alter and forge.

(4) IDENTIFIABLE COMPONENT PART. Such term includes any part of a vehicle that an identifying number stamped or placed on it by the manufacturer or other authorized person or any part that can be identified by other means as being a part of a particular vehicle.

(g) An identification number may be placed on a vehicle, engine, transmission, or other identifiable component part of a vehicle, by its manufacturer in the regular course of business or placed or restored on same by authority of the department without violating this section; an identification number so placed or restored is not falsified.

(h) Any vehicle, engine, transmission, or other identifiable component part, wherein the identification number or numbers appear to be altered, or removed may be seized and detained by law enforcement officials for a reasonable period of time for determination of the true identity of the vehicle, engine, transmission, or other component parts. Any item seized by law enforcement officials, wherein ownership cannot be determined shall be contraband and subject to forfeiture.

(i) Any seized item taken or retained under this section shall not be subject to replevin but is deemed to be in the custody of the state, county or municipal law enforcement agency subject only to the orders and judgment of the court having jurisdiction over the forfeiture proceedings.

(j) Any vehicle which has been reported stolen and subsequently recovered by law enforcement officials may be returned to the person claiming ownership upon proper ownership documentation. However, any recovered vehicle wherein ownership is in question shall be returned subject only to the orders of a circuit court having jurisdiction of the matter.

(k) No civil liability shall attach to any law enforcement official acting in good faith under this section.

(l) When property is forfeited under this section, the state, county, or municipal law enforcement agency may with approval of a court of competent jurisdiction:

(1) Retain it for official use.

(2) Have it placed in a crusher and destroyed.

(3) Any vehicle which is retained for official use under this section, shall be placed in a crusher and destroyed, upon its becoming unserviceable.

(Acts 1973, No. 765, p. 1147, §40; Acts 1984, 1st Ex. Sess., No. 84-795, p. 203.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1988–2010 · leading case: Carter v. Chrysler Corp., 743 So. 2d 456 (Ala. Civ. App. 1998).
Carter v. Chrysler Corp., 743 So. 2d 456 (Ala. Civ. App. 1998). “In Johnny Spradlin Auto Parts, the Court considered a situation where the defendant had replaced a vehicle identification plate, in violation of § 32-8-86, Ala. Code 1975. The defendant argued that it did not owe a duty of disclosure to subsequent purchasers of the automobile…”
State v. One 1984 Camaro in Possession of Brock, 521 So. 2d 42 (Ala. Civ. App. 1988). · cites it 6× “The investigation resulted in a determination that the vehicle had been altered in violation of section 32-8-86, Code 1975 (1986 Cum.Supp.”
Cotton v. State, 591 So. 2d 862 (Ala. Civ. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “The State subsequently filed separate condemnation complaints against each of the vehicles and the motor pursuant to § 32-8-86, Code 1975. This statute provides that any.”
State v. Southtrust Bank of Cullman, N.A., 534 So. 2d 270 (Ala. 1988). · cites it 5× “The State claims that under Ala. Code 1975, § 32-8-86, the Camaro should be forfeited to the State of Alabama Bureau of Investigation for use in Cullman.”
State v. 1980 Chevrolet Corvette, 568 So. 2d 1233 (Ala. Civ. App. 1990). “This action was brought by the State of Alabama pursuant to § 32-8-86(h), Ala. Code 1975. The State sought forfeiture of a 1980 model Chevrolet Corvette, alleging that the vehicle identification number had been altered so that ownership of the automobile could not be determined.”
Barton v. State, 519 So. 2d 1344 (Ala. 1988). · cites it 2× “Particularly, the State proceeded pursuant to §§ 32-8-86(h), -(/), and 32-8-87. We affirm.”
Glover v. State, 553 So. 2d 131 (Ala. Civ. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “The seizure was the result of a determination that the vehicle identification numbers (VIN) had been altered and falsified, in violation of § 32-8-86, Ala. Code 1975. Following an investigation, the State found that the automobile “had an engine and transmission with altered VIN…”
Wesley Little v. State of Alabama., 72 So. 3d 139 (Ala. Crim. App. 2010). “, of a firearm whose identifying marks have been obliterated, and because this objective is equivalent to the purpose of the VIN falsification provisions of § 32-8-86, we believe the mental state required for criminal possession, etc.”
— Ala. Code § 32-8-86(h) — 5 cases
State v. One 1984 Camaro in Possession of Brock, 521 So. 2d 42 (Ala. Civ. App. 1988). “The investigation resulted in a determination that the vehicle had been altered in violation of section 32-8-86, Code 1975 (1986 Cum.Supp.”
State v. 1980 Chevrolet Corvette, 568 So. 2d 1233 (Ala. Civ. App. 1990). “This action was brought by the State of Alabama pursuant to § 32-8-86(h), Ala. Code 1975. The State sought forfeiture of a 1980 model Chevrolet Corvette, alleging that the vehicle identification number had been altered so that ownership of the automobile could not be determined.”
Barton v. State, 519 So. 2d 1344 (Ala. 1988). “Particularly, the State proceeded pursuant to §§ 32-8-86(h), -(/), and 32-8-87. We affirm.”
State v. Southtrust Bank of Cullman, N.A., 534 So. 2d 270 (Ala. 1988). “The State claims that under Ala. Code 1975, § 32-8-86, the Camaro should be forfeited to the State of Alabama Bureau of Investigation for use in Cullman.”
Glover v. State, 553 So. 2d 131 (Ala. Civ. App. 1989). “The seizure was the result of a determination that the vehicle identification numbers (VIN) had been altered and falsified, in violation of § 32-8-86, Ala. Code 1975. Following an investigation, the State found that the automobile “had an engine and transmission with altered VIN…”
— Ala. Code § 32-8-86(j) — 2 cases
State v. One 1984 Camaro in Possession of Brock, 521 So. 2d 42 (Ala. Civ. App. 1988). “The investigation resulted in a determination that the vehicle had been altered in violation of section 32-8-86, Code 1975 (1986 Cum.Supp.”
State v. Southtrust Bank of Cullman, N.A., 534 So. 2d 270 (Ala. 1988). “The State claims that under Ala. Code 1975, § 32-8-86, the Camaro should be forfeited to the State of Alabama Bureau of Investigation for use in Cullman.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.