Code of Alabama
Ala. Code § 41-16-1 (2026)
Withdrawal by Contractor of Amounts Retained from Payments Under Contract.
✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
Repealed by Acts 1997, No. 97-225, p. 348, §4, effective April 22, 1997.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1986–2013 · leading case: Health Care Auth. for Baptist Health v. Davis, 158 So. 3d 397 (Ala. 2013).
Health Care Auth. for Baptist Health v. Davis, 158 So. 3d 397 (Ala. 2013). “Code 1975, § 14-2-36); Thomas, supra (holding that contracts of the Alabama Municipal Electric Authority, which was held not to have State immunity, are not subject to the public-contract statutes, see Ala.Code 1975, § 41-16-1 et seq., which include the competitive-bid statutes,…”
Spring Hill Lighting & Supply Co. v. Square D Co., Inc., 662 So. 2d 1141 (Ala. 1995). “1990), a disappointed bidder had brought an action "pursuant to Ala. Code 1975, § 41-16-1 et seq., the Alabama Competitive Bid Law.”
Gulf State Park Auth. v. Gulf Beach Hotel, Inc., 22 So. 3d 432 (Ala. 2009). “That case "present[ed] the single issue of whether a State of Alabama agency has the authority to negotiate for the lease of real property or must lease real property pursuant to the competitive bid law, Ala.Code 1975, § 41-16-1 et. seq." 622 So.”
Urban Sanitation Corp. v. City of Pell City, Ala., 662 F. Supp. 1041 (N.D. Ala. 1986). “2d 480 (1973) (considering § 41-16-1). 5 § 41-16-1 merely extends standing to seek protection of a public interest to unsuccessful bidders.”
Cotton Bayou Ass'n v. Dep't of Conservation, 622 So. 2d 924 (Ala. 1993). “This appeal presents the single issue of whether a State of Alabama agency has *925 the authority to negotiate for the lease of real property or must lease real property pursuant to the competitive bid law, Ala. Code 1975, § 41-16-1 et seq. The trial court held that the State…”
Union Springs Tel. Co., Inc. v. Rowell, 623 So. 2d 732 (Ala. 1993). “The Taitón contract was not entered into in accordance with the Competitive Bid Law, Ala.Code 1975, § 41-16-1 et seq.] “3. On May 5,1992, USTC was notified in writing by Corrections that its contract regarding the provision of pay-telephone services at BCCF would not be renewed…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.