Code of Alabama

Ala. Code § 5-19-9 (2026)

Application of Payments When Buyer Indebted to Same Seller for Two or More Consumer Credit Sales.

✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaAla. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

When the buyer is indebted to a particular seller for two or more consumer credit sales of goods and the goods which were the subject of two or more sales secure the buyer’s total debt to the seller, the security shall be discharged by applying the buyer’s payments as they are received by the seller or the seller’s assignee to the portions of the debt in the order in which they were incurred. To the extent that debts are paid according to the preceding sentence, security interests in items of property terminate as the debt originally incurred with respect to each item is paid. Payments received by the seller upon a revolving charge account are deemed, for the purpose of determining the amount of the debt secured by the various security interests, to have been applied first to the payment of finance charges in the order of their entry to the account and then to the payment of debts in the order in which the entries to the account showing the debts were made. If the debts consolidated arose from two or more consumer sales made on the same day, payments received by the seller are deemed, for the purpose of determining the amount of the debt secured by the various security interests, to have been applied first to the payment of the smallest debt. This section shall not apply to two or more consumer credit sales made by the same seller to the same buyer when the debts have been assigned to different and unrelated persons for value and the assignment was bona fide and not for the purpose of violating this section.

(Acts 1971, No. 2052, p. 3290, §5; Acts 1996, No. 96-576, p. 887, §2.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1985–1991 · leading case: Snap-On Tools Corp. v. Freeman (In Re Freeman), 124 B.R. 840 (N.D. Ala. 1991).
Snap-On Tools Corp. v. Freeman (In Re Freeman), 124 B.R. 840 (N.D. Ala. 1991). · cites it 5× “Ala.Code § 5-19-9 (1975) 5 provides for the application of payments when the buyer is indebted to the same seller for two or more consumer credit sales.”
Skinner's Furniture Store of Greenville, Inc. v. McCall (In Re McCall), 62 B.R. 57 (M.D. Ala. 1985). · cites it 2× “1975 Alabama Code § 5-19-9. To require Skinner’s Furniture to include only a purely chronological first-in, first-out allocation schedule would force it to choose between not complying with the Consumer Finance Law and not creating a purchase money security interest.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.