(1) Express warranties by the seller are created as follows:
(a) Any affirmation of fact or promise made by the seller to the buyer which relates to the goods and becomes part of the basis of the bargain creates an express warranty that the goods shall conform to the affirmation or promise.
(b) Any description of the goods which is made part of the basis of the bargain creates an express warranty that the goods shall conform to the description.
(c) Any sample or model which is made part of the basis of the bargain creates an express warranty that the whole of the goods shall conform to the sample or model.
(2) It is not necessary to the creation of an express warranty that the seller use formal words such as “warrant” or “guarantee” or that he have a specific intention to make a warranty, but an affirmation merely of the value of the goods or a statement purporting to be merely the seller’s opinion or commendation of the goods does not create a warranty.
(Acts 1965, No. 549, p. 811.)
Notes of Decisions
Brown v. Gen. Motors Corp., 14 So. 3d 104 (Ala. 2009).
· cites it 16× “[8] The various definitions of "express warranty" found in Ala.Code 1975, § 7-2-313, all relate to the inherent quality or specifications of the goods sold.”
La Trace v. Webster, 17 So. 3d 1210 (Ala. Civ. App. 2008).
· cites it 14× “The Breach-of-Warranty, Breach-of-Contract, and Fraudulent-Misrepresentation Claims La Trace first argues that the disclaimers relied upon by the Websters were not effective to bar his breach-of-warranty, breach-of-contract, and fraudulent-misrepresentation claims under §§…”
Shutter Shop, Inc. v. Amersham Corp., 114 F. Supp. 2d 1218 (M.D. Ala. 2000).
· cites it 5× “The law of express warranties is set forth in § 7-2-313 of the Alabama Code: (1) Express warranties by the seller are created as follows: (a) Any affirmation of fact or promise made by the seller to the buyer which relates to the goods and becomes part of the basis of the…”
Boyd v. TTI Floorcare North Am., 230 F. Supp. 3d 1266 (N.D. Ala. 2011).
· cites it 7× “Ala. Code § 7-2-313 . Any affirmation of fact relied upon by the buyer may be considered an express warranty.”
Hobbs v. Gen. Motors Corp., 134 F. Supp. 2d 1277 (M.D. Ala. 2001).
· cites it 2× “Code § 7-2-313. When courts apply such statutory language to statements made to buyers to determine whether an express warranty has been created, they often focus on the difference between statements of fact and statements of opinion or mere “puffing.”
Clark v. Jim Walter Homes, Inc., 719 F. Supp. 1037 (M.D. Ala. 1989).
· cites it 4× “1975 Code of Ala. § 7-2-313 (1984). Given this definition of express warranty, the substance of the allegations made by Wavie Clark in his deposition, and the factual dispute between the parties as to the applicability of Mosley, 439 So.”
Rhode v. E & T Investments, Inc., 6 F. Supp. 2d 1322 (M.D. Ala. 1998).
· cites it 2× “2 On January 7, 1998, Plaintiff commenced this action against Defendants in the Circuit Court of Dale County, Alabama, alleging, inter alia, breach of contract, breach of express and implied warranties, claims under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty-Federal Trade Commission Improvement…”
Skelton v. Druid City Hosp. Bd., 459 So. 2d 818 (Ala. 1984).
· cites it 2× “) Official Comment, § 7-2-313, Code 1975. "(1) This title shall be liberally construed and applied to promote its underlying purposes and policies.”
— Ala. Code § 7-2-313(1) — 3 cases
Brown v. Gen. Motors Corp., 14 So. 3d 104 (Ala. 2009).
“[8] The various definitions of "express warranty" found in Ala.Code 1975, § 7-2-313, all relate to the inherent quality or specifications of the goods sold.”
— Ala. Code § 7-2-313(1)(a) — 3 cases
— Ala. Code § 7-2-313(2) — 3 cases
Brown v. Gen. Motors Corp., 14 So. 3d 104 (Ala. 2009).
“[8] The various definitions of "express warranty" found in Ala.Code 1975, § 7-2-313, all relate to the inherent quality or specifications of the goods sold.”
— Ala. Code § 7-2-313(a) — 1 case
— Ala. Code § 7-2-313(l) — 1 case
— Ala. Code § 7-2-313(l)(a) — 2 cases
— Ala. Code § 7-2-313(l)(b) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.