Code of Alabama

Ala. Code § 7-9-502 (2026)

Collection Rights of Secured Party.

✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaAla. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Repealed by Act 2001-481, p. 647, § 4, effective January 1, 2002.

(Acts 1965, No. 549, p. 811; Acts 1981, No. 81-312, p. 399.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1982–1989 · leading case: Wadsworth v. Yancey Bros. Co., 423 So. 2d 1343 (Ala. 1982).
Wadsworth v. Yancey Bros. Co., 423 So. 2d 1343 (Ala. 1982). · cites it 2× “See, specifically, § 7-9-102(1)(b) (sale of chattel paper); § 7-9-102(2) (transfer for security of chattel paper); § 7-9-105(1)(a) (definition of account debtor), -(1)(b) (definition of chattel paper), -(1)(d) (definition of debtor); § 7-9-308 (priority of rights after outright…”
Cent. Accept. Corp. v. Colonial Bank of Ala., 439 So. 2d 144 (Ala. 1983). · cites it 2× “Their contention that the bank can, with impunity, collect the same debt twice ignores the protection afforded by § 7-9-502 (2), which requires that if the bank undertakes to collect on the obligations held as collateral it must proceed in a commercially reasonable manner and…”
Waide v. Tractor & Equip. Co., 545 So. 2d 1327 (Ala. 1989). · cites it 2× “1984), and Ala. Code 1975, § 7-9-502(2). For the foregoing reasons, the summary judgment in favor of T E is hereby affirmed.”
— Ala. Code § 7-9-502(2) — 1 case
Waide v. Tractor & Equip. Co., 545 So. 2d 1327 (Ala. 1989). “1984), and Ala. Code 1975, § 7-9-502(2). For the foregoing reasons, the summary judgment in favor of T E is hereby affirmed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.