Alaska Stat. » Chapter 11.35
Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 11.46.260 (2026)

Removal of identification marks

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 11.46.260. Removal of identification marks.
 (a) A person commits the crime of removal of identification marks if, with intent to cause interruption to the ownership of another, the person defaces, erases, or otherwise alters or attempts to deface, erase, or otherwise alter any serial number or identification mark placed or inscribed on a propelled vehicle, bicycle, firearm, movable or immovable construction tool or equipment, appliance, merchandise, or other article or its component parts.

 (b) Removal of identification marks is
       (1) a class C felony if the value of the property on which the serial number or identification mark appeared is $750 or more;

 (2) a class A misdemeanor if the value of the property on which the serial number or identification mark appeared is $250 or more but less than $750;

 (3) a class B misdemeanor if the value of the property on which the serial number or identification mark appeared is less than $250.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2004–2004 · leading case: Wells v. State, 102 P.3d 972 (Alaska Ct. App. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Wells v. State, 102 P.3d 972 (Alaska Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “[7] At Wells's trial, the judge gave the jury no instruction concerning the meaning of "treatment", and the prosecutor argued to the jury that "treatment" included the examination and diagnostic testing in this case.”
Alaska Stat. § 11.46.260(a): 1 case
Wells v. State, 102 P.3d 972 (Alaska Ct. App. 2004). “[7] At Wells's trial, the judge gave the jury no instruction concerning the meaning of "treatment", and the prosecutor argued to the jury that "treatment" included the examination and diagnostic testing in this case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.