Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 11.46.290 (2026)

Obtaining an access device or identification document by fraudulent means

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 11.46.290. Obtaining an access device or identification document by fraudulent means.
 (a) A person commits the crime of obtaining an access device or identification document by fraudulent means if
     (1) the person buys an access device or identification document from a person other than the issuer or, as other than the issuer, the person sells an access device or identification document;

     (2) with intent to defraud, the person obtains an access device or identification document; or

     (3) with intent to defraud, the person makes a false statement in an application for an access device or identification document.

 (b) Obtaining an access device or identification document by fraudulent means is a class C felony.




Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1999–2015 · leading case: State v. Morgan, 985 P.2d 1022 (Alaska Ct. App. 1999).
State v. Morgan, 985 P.2d 1022 (Alaska Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 6× “The question before us is whether Morgan could be convicted under AS 11.46.290(a) of obtaining a credit card by fraudulent means when he only obtained the credit card number and not the physical card.”
Kankanton v. State, 342 P.3d 840 (Alaska Ct. App. 2015). “65, § 5, SLA 2000 (amending AS 11.46.290). 14 . See ch. 65, § 6, SLA 2000 (enacting AS 11.”
— Alaska Stat. § 11.46.290(a) — 1 case
State v. Morgan, 985 P.2d 1022 (Alaska Ct. App. 1999). “The question before us is whether Morgan could be convicted under AS 11.46.290(a) of obtaining a credit card by fraudulent means when he only obtained the credit card number and not the physical card.”
— Alaska Stat. § 11.46.290(a)(1) — 1 case
State v. Morgan, 985 P.2d 1022 (Alaska Ct. App. 1999). “The question before us is whether Morgan could be convicted under AS 11.46.290(a) of obtaining a credit card by fraudulent means when he only obtained the credit card number and not the physical card.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.