Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 11.56.120 (2026)
Receiving unlawful gratuities
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 11.56.120. Receiving unlawful gratuities.
(a) A public servant commits the crime of receiving unlawful gratuities if, for having engaged in an official act which was required or authorized and for which the public servant was not entitled to any special or additional compensation, the public servant
(1) solicits a benefit, regardless of value; or
(2) accepts or agrees to accept a benefit having a value of $50 or more.
(b) Receiving unlawful gratuities is a class A misdemeanor.
(a) A public servant commits the crime of receiving unlawful gratuities if, for having engaged in an official act which was required or authorized and for which the public servant was not entitled to any special or additional compensation, the public servant
(1) solicits a benefit, regardless of value; or
(2) accepts or agrees to accept a benefit having a value of $50 or more.
(b) Receiving unlawful gratuities is a class A misdemeanor.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1989–2006 · leading case: Stanton v. State, 2006 WY 31 (Wyo. 2006).
Stanton v. State, 2006 WY 31 (Wyo. 2006). “Alaska Stat. § 11.56.120 (a) provided that a public servant committed the crime of bribery if he or she solicited, accepted or agreed to accept a benefit for engaging in an authorized or required official act.”
State v. Mullin, 778 P.2d 233 (Alaska Ct. App. 1989). “The trial court granted Mullin’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that Mullin was not a public servant within the purview of AS 11.56.120. The state appeals from the order of dismissal.”
— Alaska Stat. § 11.56.120(a) — 1 case
State v. Mullin, 778 P.2d 233 (Alaska Ct. App. 1989). “The trial court granted Mullin’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that Mullin was not a public servant within the purview of AS 11.56.120. The state appeals from the order of dismissal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.