Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 11.56.350 (2026)
Unlawful evasion in the second degree. [Repealed, § 6 ch 51 SLA 1995.]
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1991–1994 · leading case: LeFever v. State, 877 P.2d 1298 (Alaska Ct. App. 1994).
LeFever v. State, 877 P.2d 1298 (Alaska Ct. App. 1994). “340 and AS 11.56.350, are together intended to cover all people who fail to return to official detention, and that the statutes’ introductory language is intended simply to classify unlawful evasion by seriousness of the evader’s original conduct, not to exclude adjudicated…”
Aiken v. State, 821 P.2d 1371 (Alaska Ct. App. 1991). “Scott Aiken was convicted in a bench trial of unlawful evasion in the second degree, AS 11.56.350. 1 He appeals, contending that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction.”
— Alaska Stat. § 11.56.350(a) — 1 case
LeFever v. State, 877 P.2d 1298 (Alaska Ct. App. 1994). “340 and AS 11.56.350, are together intended to cover all people who fail to return to official detention, and that the statutes’ introductory language is intended simply to classify unlawful evasion by seriousness of the evader’s original conduct, not to exclude adjudicated…”
— Alaska Stat. § 11.56.350(a)(1) — 1 case
Aiken v. State, 821 P.2d 1371 (Alaska Ct. App. 1991). “Scott Aiken was convicted in a bench trial of unlawful evasion in the second degree, AS 11.56.350. 1 He appeals, contending that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.