Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 12.80.050 (2026)
[Renumbered as
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1983–1986 · leading case: Galbraith v. State, 693 P.2d 880 (Alaska Ct. App. 1985).
Galbraith v. State, 693 P.2d 880 (Alaska Ct. App. 1985). “015, and section 40, enacted as AS 12.80.050, conflict with Alaska Rule of Criminal Procedure 37 and Evidence Rule 901, respectively, the existing rules of court control.”
Page v. State, 725 P.2d 1082 (Alaska Ct. App. 1986). “In the absence of prejudice to Page, we do not believe that application of an exclusionary rule, based upon the slate’s failure to comply with AS 12.80.050, is warranted. We find no error in the admission of the photographs.”
Hatfield v. State, 663 P.2d 987 (Alaska Ct. App. 1983). “Although photographs were taken, it is arguable that, in the absence of an accurate determination of weight, any written description of the stolen property would not comply with the requirements of AS 12.80.050(b). 6 . We recognize that some of the loose copper Willie Hartman…”
— Alaska Stat. § 12.80.050(b) — 1 case
Hatfield v. State, 663 P.2d 987 (Alaska Ct. App. 1983). “Although photographs were taken, it is arguable that, in the absence of an accurate determination of weight, any written description of the stolen property would not comply with the requirements of AS 12.80.050(b). 6 . We recognize that some of the loose copper Willie Hartman…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.