Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 13.16.215 (2026)
Supervised administration; nature of proceeding
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 13.16.215. Supervised administration; nature of proceeding.
Supervised administration is a single in rem proceeding to secure complete administration and settlement of a decedent's estate under the continuing authority of the court which extends until entry of an order approving distribution of the estate and discharging the personal representative or other order terminating the proceeding. A supervised personal representative is responsible to the court, as well as to the interested parties, and is subject to directions concerning the estate made by the court on its own motion or on the motion of any interested party. Except as otherwise provided in AS 13.16.215 — 13.16.235, or as otherwise ordered by the court, a supervised personal representative has the same duties and powers as a personal representative who is not supervised.
Supervised administration is a single in rem proceeding to secure complete administration and settlement of a decedent's estate under the continuing authority of the court which extends until entry of an order approving distribution of the estate and discharging the personal representative or other order terminating the proceeding. A supervised personal representative is responsible to the court, as well as to the interested parties, and is subject to directions concerning the estate made by the court on its own motion or on the motion of any interested party. Except as otherwise provided in AS 13.16.215 — 13.16.235, or as otherwise ordered by the court, a supervised personal representative has the same duties and powers as a personal representative who is not supervised.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1977–2022 · leading case: In Re Est. of Pushruk, 562 P.2d 329 (Alaska 1977).
In Re Est. of Pushruk, 562 P.2d 329 (Alaska 1977). “See AS 13.16.215 et seq. 14 . We note that if no statutory beneficiaries survive and the recovery therefore becomes part of the estate, AS 09.”
In the Matter of the Est. of Lionel D., In the Matter of the Est. of Lionel D. (Alaska 2022). “for unlawfully converted profits,” and that there was a “ ‘real issue’ of whether or not there is a substantial conflict of interest,” the court concluded by clear and convincing evidence that Cliff’s removal was mandatory. The court found additional grounds for removing Cliff…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.