Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 15.13.120 (2026)
[Renumbered as
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1975–1988 · leading case: State v. Marshall, 633 P.2d 227 (Alaska 1981).
State v. Marshall, 633 P.2d 227 (Alaska 1981). “The original version of AS 15.13.120, defining violations and providing, inter alia, for forfeiture, did not require willfulness for a failure to report to constitute a violation, nor as a prerequisite to forfeiture.”
Warren v. Boucher, 543 P.2d 731 (Alaska 1975). “[18] AS 15.13.120(a) imposes penalties of up to one year of imprisonment or a fine up to $5,000 for violation of the act.”
Messerli v. State, 626 P.2d 81 (Alaska 1980). “[2] The criminal sanctions against those who violate the Act are provided in AS 15.13.120(a), which states in pertinent part: A person who violates a provision of this chapter is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, is punishable by imprisonment for not more than one…”
Veco Intern. v. Alaska Pub. Off. Com'n, 753 P.2d 703 (Alaska 1988). “However, the threat of criminal prosecution pursuant to AS 15.13.120(a) already provides ample deterrence.”
VECO Int'l, Inc. v. Alaska Pub. Offices Comm'n, 753 P.2d 703 (Alaska 1988). “However, the threat of criminal prosecution pursuant to AS 15.13.120(a) already provides ample deterrence.”
— Alaska Stat. § 15.13.120(a) — 5 cases
Messerli v. State, 626 P.2d 81 (Alaska 1980). “[2] The criminal sanctions against those who violate the Act are provided in AS 15.13.120(a), which states in pertinent part: A person who violates a provision of this chapter is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, is punishable by imprisonment for not more than one…”
Warren v. Boucher, 543 P.2d 731 (Alaska 1975). “[18] AS 15.13.120(a) imposes penalties of up to one year of imprisonment or a fine up to $5,000 for violation of the act.”
State v. Marshall, 633 P.2d 227 (Alaska 1981). “The original version of AS 15.13.120, defining violations and providing, inter alia, for forfeiture, did not require willfulness for a failure to report to constitute a violation, nor as a prerequisite to forfeiture.”
Veco Intern. v. Alaska Pub. Off. Com'n, 753 P.2d 703 (Alaska 1988). “However, the threat of criminal prosecution pursuant to AS 15.13.120(a) already provides ample deterrence.”
VECO Int'l, Inc. v. Alaska Pub. Offices Comm'n, 753 P.2d 703 (Alaska 1988). “However, the threat of criminal prosecution pursuant to AS 15.13.120(a) already provides ample deterrence.”
— Alaska Stat. § 15.13.120(a)(1) — 2 cases
Veco Intern. v. Alaska Pub. Off. Com'n, 753 P.2d 703 (Alaska 1988). “However, the threat of criminal prosecution pursuant to AS 15.13.120(a) already provides ample deterrence.”
VECO Int'l, Inc. v. Alaska Pub. Offices Comm'n, 753 P.2d 703 (Alaska 1988). “However, the threat of criminal prosecution pursuant to AS 15.13.120(a) already provides ample deterrence.”
— Alaska Stat. § 15.13.120(b) — 2 cases
State v. Marshall, 633 P.2d 227 (Alaska 1981). “The original version of AS 15.13.120, defining violations and providing, inter alia, for forfeiture, did not require willfulness for a failure to report to constitute a violation, nor as a prerequisite to forfeiture.”
Warren v. Boucher, 543 P.2d 731 (Alaska 1975). “[18] AS 15.13.120(a) imposes penalties of up to one year of imprisonment or a fine up to $5,000 for violation of the act.”
— Alaska Stat. § 15.13.120(d) — 1 case
Warren v. Boucher, 543 P.2d 731 (Alaska 1975). “[18] AS 15.13.120(a) imposes penalties of up to one year of imprisonment or a fine up to $5,000 for violation of the act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.