Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 18.23.010 (2026)
Limitation on liability for persons providing information to review organization
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 18.23.010. Limitation on liability for persons providing information to review organization.
(a) A person providing information to a review organization is not subject to action for damages or other relief by reason of having furnished that information unless the information is false and the person providing the information knew or had reason to know the information was false.
(b) A privilege of confidentiality arising from a physician-patient relationship may not be invoked to withhold pertinent information from review by a review organization.
(a) A person providing information to a review organization is not subject to action for damages or other relief by reason of having furnished that information unless the information is false and the person providing the information knew or had reason to know the information was false.
(b) A privilege of confidentiality arising from a physician-patient relationship may not be invoked to withhold pertinent information from review by a review organization.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2015–2018 · leading case: Mat-Su Valley Med. Ctr., LLC v. Bolinder, 427 P.3d 754 (Alaska 2018).
Mat-Su Valley Med. Ctr., LLC v. Bolinder, 427 P.3d 754 (Alaska 2018). “56 Another provision of the statute, AS 18.23.010, contains similar language to that of the false information exception in AS 18.”
Brandner v. Bateman, 349 P.3d 1068 (Alaska 2015). “Floerchinger and Gitomer are immune under AS 18.23.010, which grants immunity to witnesses providing information to *1072 a review organization so long as the witnesses did not knowingly make false statements.”
— Alaska Stat. § 18.23.010(a) — 1 case
Mat-Su Valley Med. Ctr., LLC v. Bolinder, 427 P.3d 754 (Alaska 2018). “56 Another provision of the statute, AS 18.23.010, contains similar language to that of the false information exception in AS 18.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.