Alaska Stat. » Chapter 18.80

Alaska Stat. § 18.80.135

Judicial review and enforcement

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 18.80.135. Judicial review and enforcement.
 (a) A complainant, or person against whom a complaint is filed or other person aggrieved by an order of the commission, may obtain judicial review of the order in accordance with AS 44.62.560 — 44.62.570.

 (b) The commission may obtain a court order for the enforcement of any of its orders by filing a complaint with the superior court in the judicial district in which the unlawful practice is alleged to have occurred.




Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1980–2008 · leading case: McDaniel v. Cory
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
McDaniel v. Cory (1981) alaska · cites it 4× “This decision was appealed to the superior court by the Disco Management pursuant to AS 18.80.135. [13] In his decision dated April 19, 1979, Judge Peter Kalamarides reversed the Commission's award of $600.”
State, Department of Fish & Game, Sport Fish Division v. Meyer (1995) alaska · cites it 3× “Reviewability of Case-Closing Decisions by Commission Staff or Executive Director ADF & G and the Commission argue that decision of the Commission staff or executive director is not reviewable because the decision (1) is not an “order” under AS 18.80.135, (2) does not constitute…”
Pipeliners Union 798, United Ass'n v. Alaska State Commission for Human Rights (1984) alaska · cites it 9× “INTERPRETATION OF AS 18.80.135 The Union first contends that the superi- or court erred in refusing to consider in the enforcement action the issues raised in its appeal from the back pay orders.”
Adams v. Pipeliners Union 798 (1985) alaska · cites it 5× “STANDING AS 18.80.135(a) provides that a "complainant .”
Johnson v. Alaska State Department of Fish & Game (1991) alaska “The state did not appeal the Commission’s order, as it was entitled to do under AS 18.80.135. Meanwhile, on March 13, 1981, the surf fishermen had filed a complaint in the superior court seeking “an injunction, damages, and other appropriate relief,” pursuant to AS 18.”
Johnson v. State (1980) alaska “145, or to issue any binding order under AS 18.80.135(b) related to sentencing. 11 The Commission’s power to act outside of the areas enumerated in AS 18.”
Parson v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE (2008) alaska “[33] AS 18.80.135(a) provides that judicial review of Commission decisions shall be under the provisions of the Alaska Administrative Procedures Act, specifically AS 44.”
— Alaska Stat. § 18.80.135(a) — 5 cases
Adams v. Pipeliners Union 798 (1985) alaska “STANDING AS 18.80.135(a) provides that a "complainant .”
McDaniel v. Cory (1981) alaska “This decision was appealed to the superior court by the Disco Management pursuant to AS 18.80.135. [13] In his decision dated April 19, 1979, Judge Peter Kalamarides reversed the Commission's award of $600.”
Pipeliners Union 798, United Ass'n v. Alaska State Commission for Human Rights (1984) alaska “INTERPRETATION OF AS 18.80.135 The Union first contends that the superi- or court erred in refusing to consider in the enforcement action the issues raised in its appeal from the back pay orders.”
State, Department of Fish & Game, Sport Fish Division v. Meyer (1995) alaska “Reviewability of Case-Closing Decisions by Commission Staff or Executive Director ADF & G and the Commission argue that decision of the Commission staff or executive director is not reviewable because the decision (1) is not an “order” under AS 18.80.135, (2) does not constitute…”
Parson v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE (2008) alaska “[33] AS 18.80.135(a) provides that judicial review of Commission decisions shall be under the provisions of the Alaska Administrative Procedures Act, specifically AS 44.”
— Alaska Stat. § 18.80.135(b) — 2 cases
Pipeliners Union 798, United Ass'n v. Alaska State Commission for Human Rights (1984) alaska “INTERPRETATION OF AS 18.80.135 The Union first contends that the superi- or court erred in refusing to consider in the enforcement action the issues raised in its appeal from the back pay orders.”
Johnson v. State (1980) alaska “145, or to issue any binding order under AS 18.80.135(b) related to sentencing. 11 The Commission’s power to act outside of the areas enumerated in AS 18.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.