Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 21.36.210 (2026)

Limits on cancellation

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 21.36.210. Limits on cancellation.
 (a) An insurer may not exercise its right to cancel a policy of personal automobile insurance except for the following reasons:
     (1) nonpayment of premium; or

     (2) the driver's license or motor vehicle registration of either the named insured or of an operator who resides in the same household as the named insured or who customarily operates a motor vehicle insured under the policy has been under suspension or revocation during the policy period or, if the policy is a renewal, during its policy period or the 180 days immediately preceding its effective date.

 (b) During the policy period, a modification of automobile physical damage coverage, except coverage for loss caused by collision, whereby provision is made for the application of a deductible amount not exceeding $100 is not a cancellation of the coverage or of the policy.

 (c) [Repealed, § 47 ch 29 SLA 1987.]
 (d) This section does not apply to
     (1) the failure to renew a policy, except as to coverage in force for less than 12 months;

     (2) a policy that has been in effect less than 60 days at the time notice of cancellation is mailed or delivered by the insurer, unless it is a renewal policy.

 (e) [Repealed, § 47 ch 29 SLA 1987.]
 (f) An insurer may not exercise its right to cancel a policy of personal insurance other than personal automobile insurance, except for the following reasons:
     (1) nonpayment of premiums, including nonpayment of additional premiums, calculated in accordance with the current rating manual of the insurer, justified by a physical change in the insured property or a change in its occupancy or use;

     (2) conviction of the insured of a crime having as one of its necessary elements an act increasing a hazard insured against;

     (3) discovery of fraud or material misrepresentation made by the insured or a representative of the insured in obtaining the insurance or by the insured in pursuing a claim under the policy;

     (4) discovery of a grossly negligent act or omission by the insured that substantially increases the hazards insured against;

     (5) physical changes in the insured property that result in the property becoming uninsurable; or

     (6) entire abandonment of the property that increases a hazard insured against; if a policy is cancelled under this paragraph, in addition to the notice required under AS 21.36.220, the insurer shall give notice of cancellation of the policy to a lender on file with the insurer at the time of the cancellation; in this paragraph, “entire abandonment” means the property is no longer occupied by the insured as defined by the policy and does not have contents of substantial utility; however, property is not entirely abandoned if the insured or an agent for the insured demonstrates that the property is being reasonably maintained and monitored for a condition that might cause damage to the property.




Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2000–2004 · leading case: Bennett v. Hedglin, 995 P.2d 668 (Alaska 2000).
Bennett v. Hedglin, 995 P.2d 668 (Alaska 2000). · cites it 4× “15 In fact, statutory language added at the same time as AS 21.36.210 and AS 21.36.220 specifically contemplates rescission as a remedy.”
Zurich Am. Ins. Co. v. Whittier Props. Inc. D.B.A. Zipmart, & Ribelin Lowell & Co. Ins. Brokers, Inc., 356 F.3d 1132 (9th Cir. 2004). “Compare Alaska Stat. § 21.36.210 (f)(3) (2002), Alaska Stat.”
— Alaska Stat. § 21.36.210(f) — 1 case
Bennett v. Hedglin, 995 P.2d 668 (Alaska 2000). “15 In fact, statutory language added at the same time as AS 21.36.210 and AS 21.36.220 specifically contemplates rescission as a remedy.”
— Alaska Stat. § 21.36.210(f)(3) — 1 case
Bennett v. Hedglin, 995 P.2d 668 (Alaska 2000). “15 In fact, statutory language added at the same time as AS 21.36.210 and AS 21.36.220 specifically contemplates rescission as a remedy.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.