Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 22.15.120 (2026)

Limitations on proceedings which magistrate may hear

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 22.15.120. Limitations on proceedings which magistrate may hear.
 (a) A magistrate shall preside only in cases and proceedings under AS 22.15.040, 22.15.100, and 22.15.110, and as follows:
     (1) for the recovery of money or damages only when the amount claimed, exclusive of costs, interest, and attorney fees, does not exceed $10,000;

     (2) for the recovery of specific personal property when the value of the property claimed and the damages for the detention do not exceed $10,000;

     (3) for the recovery of a penalty or forfeiture, whether given by statute or arising out of contract, not exceeding $10,000;

     (4) to give judgment without action upon the confession of the defendant for any of the cases specified in this section, except for a penalty or forfeiture imposed by statute;

     (5) to give judgment of conviction upon a plea of guilty or no contest by the defendant in a criminal proceeding within the jurisdiction of the district court;

     (6) to hear, try, and enter judgments in all cases involving misdemeanors that are not minor offenses if the defendant consents in writing that the magistrate may try the case;

     (7) to hear, try, and enter judgments in all cases involving minor offenses and violations of ordinances of political subdivisions;

     (8) for the extradition of fugitives as authorized under AS 12.70;

     (9) to provide post-conviction relief under the Alaska Rules of Criminal Procedure for any of the cases specified in (5), (6), or (7) of this subsection if the conviction occurred in the district court; or

     (10) to hear, try, and enter judgments in actions for the payment of wages brought by the Department of Labor and Workforce Development as provided in AS 22.15.040(a).

 (b) A magistrate may not preside in small claims cases under AS 22.15.040 when service is made on a defendant outside the state under Rule 11(a)(4)(C), District Court Rules of Civil Procedure.

 (c) In this section, “minor offense” means
     (1) an offense classified by statute as an infraction or a violation;

     (2) an offense for which a bail forfeiture amount has been authorized by statute and established by supreme court order; or

     (3) a statutory offense for which a conviction cannot result in incarceration, a fine greater than $300, or the loss of a valuable license.




Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1965–2023 · leading case: Akers v. State, 389 P.3d 65 (Alaska Ct. App. 2016).
Akers v. State, 389 P.3d 65 (Alaska Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 16× “To resolve this question, we must interpret AS 22.15.120—the statute that defines the authority of magistrate judges.”
Buckalew v. Holloway, 604 P.2d 240 (Alaska 1979). · cites it 2× “" AS 22.15.120(1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7). Just as with a judgment entered by a district court judge, appeal from a magistrate's entry of judgment is to the superior court.”
Theodore v. State, 407 P.2d 182 (Alaska 1965). · cites it 2× “[20] AS 22.15.120(6). [21] The supervisory authority and responsibility of the presiding superior court judge over all of the magistrate courts in his judicial district required that he be aware of calendaring problems and that, when necessary or expedient, he assist district…”
Agnes Martina Tommy v. State of Alaska, 531 P.3d 365 (Alaska Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 13× “, “cases involving minor offenses and violations of ordinances of political subdivisions[.”
Juarez v. State, 193 P.3d 773 (Alaska Ct. App. 2008). “AS 22.15.120(a)(6). 7 . 635 P.2d 472 , 478 n.”
Davis v. State, 235 P.3d 1017 (Alaska Ct. App. 2010). “AS 22.15.120(a)(7), (c); see also AS 22.15.”
— Alaska Stat. § 22.15.120(6) — 1 case
Theodore v. State, 407 P.2d 182 (Alaska 1965). “[20] AS 22.15.120(6). [21] The supervisory authority and responsibility of the presiding superior court judge over all of the magistrate courts in his judicial district required that he be aware of calendaring problems and that, when necessary or expedient, he assist district…”
— Alaska Stat. § 22.15.120(a) — 1 case
Agnes Martina Tommy v. State of Alaska, 531 P.3d 365 (Alaska Ct. App. 2023). “, “cases involving minor offenses and violations of ordinances of political subdivisions[.”
— Alaska Stat. § 22.15.120(a)(5) — 1 case
Akers v. State, 389 P.3d 65 (Alaska Ct. App. 2016). “To resolve this question, we must interpret AS 22.15.120—the statute that defines the authority of magistrate judges.”
— Alaska Stat. § 22.15.120(a)(6) — 2 cases
Agnes Martina Tommy v. State of Alaska, 531 P.3d 365 (Alaska Ct. App. 2023). “, “cases involving minor offenses and violations of ordinances of political subdivisions[.”
Juarez v. State, 193 P.3d 773 (Alaska Ct. App. 2008). “AS 22.15.120(a)(6). 7 . 635 P.2d 472 , 478 n.”
— Alaska Stat. § 22.15.120(a)(7) — 2 cases
Akers v. State, 389 P.3d 65 (Alaska Ct. App. 2016). “To resolve this question, we must interpret AS 22.15.120—the statute that defines the authority of magistrate judges.”
Davis v. State, 235 P.3d 1017 (Alaska Ct. App. 2010). “AS 22.15.120(a)(7), (c); see also AS 22.15.”
— Alaska Stat. § 22.15.120(c) — 1 case
Akers v. State, 389 P.3d 65 (Alaska Ct. App. 2016). “To resolve this question, we must interpret AS 22.15.120—the statute that defines the authority of magistrate judges.”
— Alaska Stat. § 22.15.120(e) — 1 case
Akers v. State, 389 P.3d 65 (Alaska Ct. App. 2016). “To resolve this question, we must interpret AS 22.15.120—the statute that defines the authority of magistrate judges.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.