Alaska Stat. » Chapter 24.55
Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 24.55.190 (2026)

Procedure after investigation

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 24.55.190. Procedure after investigation.
 (a) The ombudsman shall report the opinion and recommendations of the ombudsman to an agency if the ombudsman finds, after investigation, that
     (1) a matter should be further considered by the agency;

     (2) an administrative act should be modified or cancelled;

     (3) a statute or regulation on which an administrative act is based should be altered;

     (4) reasons should be given for an administrative act;

     (5) any other action should be taken by the agency;

     (6) there are no grounds for action by the agency; or

     (7) the agency's act was arbitrary or capricious, constituted an abuse of discretion, or was otherwise erroneous or not in accordance with the law.

 (b) The ombudsman may request the agency to notify the ombudsman, within a specified time, of any action taken on the recommendations.

 (c) The report provided under (a) of this section is confidential and may not be disclosed to the public by the agency. The ombudsman may disclose the report under AS 24.55.200 only after providing notice that the investigation has been concluded
     (1) to the agency; and

     (2) if the investigation was conducted in response to a complaint, to the complainant under AS 24.55.210.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2006–2006 · leading case: Cooper v. Dist. Court, 133 P.3d 692 (Alaska Ct. App. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cooper v. Dist. Court, 133 P.3d 692 (Alaska Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “AS 24.55.190. And, after waiting a reasonable amount of time''following its report to the agency in question, the Ombudsman “may present the opinion and recommendations to the governor, the legislature, a grand jury, the public[,] or any of these”.”
— Alaska Stat. § 24.55.190(c) — 1 case
Cooper v. Dist. Court, 133 P.3d 692 (Alaska Ct. App. 2006). “AS 24.55.190. And, after waiting a reasonable amount of time''following its report to the agency in question, the Ombudsman “may present the opinion and recommendations to the governor, the legislature, a grand jury, the public[,] or any of these”.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.