Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 25.15.050 (2026)
Nonliability for premarital or separate debts of other
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 25.15.050. Nonliability for premarital or separate debts of other.
Subject to AS 34.77, neither spouse is liable for the debts or liabilities of the other incurred before marriage, and, except as otherwise provided, neither is liable for the separate debts of the other, nor is the rent or income of the property of one spouse liable for the separate debts of the other.
Subject to AS 34.77, neither spouse is liable for the debts or liabilities of the other incurred before marriage, and, except as otherwise provided, neither is liable for the separate debts of the other, nor is the rent or income of the property of one spouse liable for the separate debts of the other.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1971–2019 · leading case: Wagner v. Wagner, 386 P.3d 1249 (Alaska 2017).
Wagner v. Wagner, 386 P.3d 1249 (Alaska 2017). “2014); Doug Rendleman & Scott Weingart, Collection of Student Loans: A Critical Examination, 20 Wash. & Lee J. Civ.”
Richter v. Richter, 330 P.3d 934 (Alaska 2014). “100, which allows a married person to make contracts and incur liabilities which can then be enforced "to the same extent and in the same manner as if the person were unmarried.”
Gambini v. Hamilton, 440 P.3d 184 (Alaska 2019). “"); AS 25.15.050 ("[N]either spouse is liable for the debts or liabilities of the other incurred before marriage, and .”
Allen v. Allen, 554 P.2d 393 (Alaska 1976). “" AS 25.15.050. *397 "When property is owned by one spouse the other has no interest which makes the property liable for the contracts or liabilities of the spouse who is not the owner of the property, except as provided in this chapter.”
Long v. Newby, 488 P.2d 719 (Alaska 1971). “200 which is substantially the same as AS 25.15.050 concerning liability for the separate debts of a spouse.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.