Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 25.20.030 (2026)

Duty of parent and child to maintain each other

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 25.20.030. Duty of parent and child to maintain each other.
Each parent is bound to maintain the parent's children when poor and unable to work to maintain themselves. Each child is bound to maintain the child's parents in like circumstances.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21 cases, 1976–2018 · leading case: Streb v. Streb, 774 P.2d 798 (Alaska 1989).
Streb v. Streb, 774 P.2d 798 (Alaska 1989). · cites it 3× “CHILD SUPPORT Norbert argues that the superior court erred in awarding child support because (1) post-majority child support can only be awarded in an independent action brought pursuant to AS 25.”
Reynolds v. Kimmons, 569 P.2d 799 (Alaska 1977). · cites it 2× “The adjudication also imposes liability for support (AS 25.20.030), including hospital care (AS 47.”
In Re Est. of Pushruk, 562 P.2d 329 (Alaska 1977). · cites it 2× “The estate bases its second argument on AS 25.20.030. 12 This statute requires each child to maintain his parents when they are poor and unable to work and maintain themselves.”
Dowling v. Dowling, 679 P.2d 480 (Alaska 1984). · cites it 2× “His only legal recourse to obtain post-majority aid is under AS 25.20.030, which provides that "[e]ach parent is bound to maintain his children when poor and unable to work to maintain themselves.”
Schuyler v. Briner, 13 P.3d 738 (Alaska 2000). · cites it 2× “"), with AS 25.20.030 ("Each parent is bound to maintain the parent's children when poor and unable to work to maintain themselves.”
Kodiak Island Borough v. Roe, 63 P.3d 1009 (Alaska 2003). “2d at 1007 (citing AS 25.20.030). 38 . Id. at 1007-08 . 39 .”
Malekos v. Chloe Ann Yin, 655 P.2d 728 (Alaska 1982). · cites it 2× “AS 25.20.030. See Young v. Williams, 583 P.”
Allen v. Allen, 554 P.2d 393 (Alaska 1976). · cites it 3× “AS 25.20.030. There is no legal duty, however, for such third persons as the second husband of the child's mother to provide support.”
Nunley v. State, Dep't of Revenue, Child Support Enf't Div., 99 P.3d 7 (Alaska 2004). “AS 25.20.030; Matthews v. Matthews, 739 P.”
Matthews v. Matthews, 739 P.2d 1298 (Alaska 1987). “However, without entering findings of fact or conclusions of law, the court denied Sharon’s claim for reimbursement.”
Michael W. v. Brown, 433 P.3d 1105 (Alaska 2018). “") (citing AS 25.20.030 ; In re J.J.J. , 718 P.2d 948 , 949 (Alaska 1986) ); Sickel v.”
Stephanie W. v. Maxwell V., 274 P.3d 1185 (Alaska 2012). “AS 25.20.030; see, eg., Benson v. Benson, 977 P.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.