Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 25.27.070 (2026)
Order to assign wages for support
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 25.27.070. Order to assign wages for support.
(a) In a proceeding in which the court has ordered either or both parents to pay for the support of a child, the court may, on its own motion or motion of a party or the agency on behalf of a party, after notice and an opportunity for hearing, order either parent or both parents to assign to the custodian of the child that portion of salary or wages of either parent due them currently and in the future sufficient to pay the amount ordered by the court for the support, maintenance, nurture, and education of the child.
(b) The order of assignment is binding upon an employer upon service of a copy of the order upon the employer and until further order of the court. The employer may, for each payment made under the order, deduct $1 from other wages or salary owed to the employee.
(c) The assignment made under court order has priority as against an attachment, execution, or other assignment unless otherwise ordered by the court.
(d) An employer may not terminate an employee's employment because wages of the employee are subject to an order under this section.
(a) In a proceeding in which the court has ordered either or both parents to pay for the support of a child, the court may, on its own motion or motion of a party or the agency on behalf of a party, after notice and an opportunity for hearing, order either parent or both parents to assign to the custodian of the child that portion of salary or wages of either parent due them currently and in the future sufficient to pay the amount ordered by the court for the support, maintenance, nurture, and education of the child.
(b) The order of assignment is binding upon an employer upon service of a copy of the order upon the employer and until further order of the court. The employer may, for each payment made under the order, deduct $1 from other wages or salary owed to the employee.
(c) The assignment made under court order has priority as against an attachment, execution, or other assignment unless otherwise ordered by the court.
(d) An employer may not terminate an employee's employment because wages of the employee are subject to an order under this section.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2000–2005 · leading case: Lawson v. Lawson, 108 P.3d 883 (Alaska 2005).
Lawson v. Lawson, 108 P.3d 883 (Alaska 2005). “060, 36 AS 25.27.070, 37 and AS 25.27.080. 38 Lee presents no basis for us to overrule our previous holding in Coghill that Rule 90.”
State, Dep't of Revenue v. DeLeon, 103 P.3d 897 (Alaska 2004). “AS 25.27.070. 13 . AS 25.27.230. 14 . AS 25.”
Child Support Recovery Servs., Inc. Ex Rel. S.C. v. Inn at the Waterfront, Inc., 7 P.3d 63 (Alaska 2000). “[20] AS 25.27.070 provides: (a) In a proceeding in which the court has ordered either or both parents to pay for the support of a child, the court may, on its own motion or motion of a party or the agency on behalf of a party, after notice and an opportunity for hearing, order…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.