Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 28.10.110 (2026)
Registration card. [Repealed, § 7 ch 178 SLA 1978.]
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1997–2014 · leading case: DeSalvo v. Bryant, 42 P.3d 525 (Alaska 2002).
DeSalvo v. Bryant, 42 P.3d 525 (Alaska 2002). “11 In privately settling claims under this section, therefore, parties are required to follow the procedures set out in AS 28.10.110(a) and (J). The trial court's failure to determine whether the settlement and release entered into by McCreadie, Morlang, and Weise implicated…”
Hallam v. Holland Am. Line, Inc., 27 P.3d 751 (Alaska 2001). “13 In an argument that fails to address the concerns identified in Hertz, Hallam asserts that AS 28.10.110 allows a pro se claimant to represent a class.”
Moody v. Royal Wolf Lodge, 339 P.3d 636 (Alaska 2014). “110(F), a defendant cannot be awarded attorney's fees when a plaintiff litigates his AWHA claim in good faith Moody also reiterated his claim that Royal Wolf Lodge had violated AWHA and argued that he was entitled to mandatory liquidated damages and attorney's fees under AS…”
Air Logistics of Alaska, Inc. v. Throop, 181 P.3d 1084 (Alaska 2008). “" It also noted that "[the federal counterpart to AS 28.10.110(d) imposes a lighter burden of proof on an employer, and yet even under those lighter standards exeuse from the strict application of the full liquidated damages provision is rare.”
Grimes v. Kinney Shoe Corp., 938 P.2d 997 (Alaska 1997). “Reading Civil Rule 82 and the AWHA, so as to give effect to both, compels the conclusion that Civil Rule 82 attorneys fees are available to a prevailing defendant in an AWHA claim under former AS 28.10.110. With respect to Grimes’ assertion that allowing prevailing employers to…”
— Alaska Stat. § 28.10.110(2) — 1 case
Moody v. Royal Wolf Lodge, 339 P.3d 636 (Alaska 2014). “110(F), a defendant cannot be awarded attorney's fees when a plaintiff litigates his AWHA claim in good faith Moody also reiterated his claim that Royal Wolf Lodge had violated AWHA and argued that he was entitled to mandatory liquidated damages and attorney's fees under AS…”
— Alaska Stat. § 28.10.110(a) — 1 case
DeSalvo v. Bryant, 42 P.3d 525 (Alaska 2002). “11 In privately settling claims under this section, therefore, parties are required to follow the procedures set out in AS 28.10.110(a) and (J). The trial court's failure to determine whether the settlement and release entered into by McCreadie, Morlang, and Weise implicated…”
— Alaska Stat. § 28.10.110(b) — 1 case
Hallam v. Holland Am. Line, Inc., 27 P.3d 751 (Alaska 2001). “13 In an argument that fails to address the concerns identified in Hertz, Hallam asserts that AS 28.10.110 allows a pro se claimant to represent a class.”
— Alaska Stat. § 28.10.110(c) — 1 case
DeSalvo v. Bryant, 42 P.3d 525 (Alaska 2002). “11 In privately settling claims under this section, therefore, parties are required to follow the procedures set out in AS 28.10.110(a) and (J). The trial court's failure to determine whether the settlement and release entered into by McCreadie, Morlang, and Weise implicated…”
— Alaska Stat. § 28.10.110(d) — 1 case
Air Logistics of Alaska, Inc. v. Throop, 181 P.3d 1084 (Alaska 2008). “" It also noted that "[the federal counterpart to AS 28.10.110(d) imposes a lighter burden of proof on an employer, and yet even under those lighter standards exeuse from the strict application of the full liquidated damages provision is rare.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.