Alaska Stat. » Chapter 28.35
Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 28.35.010 (2026)

Driving a vehicle without owner's consent. [Repealed, § 21 ch 166 SLA 1978. For current law, see

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 28.35.010. Driving a vehicle without owner's consent. [Repealed, § 21 ch 166 SLA 1978. For current law, see AS 11.46.360.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1970–1998 · leading case: Bell v. State, 598 P.2d 908 (Alaska 1979).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bell v. State, 598 P.2d 908 (Alaska 1979). · cites it 12× “On February 23, 1977, the grand jury returned an indictment charging Bell with felony joyriding, in violation of AS 28.35.010. The felony indictment was based upon the language of AS 28.”
Kimoktoak v. State, 584 P.2d 25 (Alaska 1978). · cites it 6× “In this appeal, Kimoktoak challenges his conviction for failure to render aid under AS 28.35.060 on the grounds that the statute is unconstitutional, that two of the instructions given the jury were improper, and that the trial court improperly allowed a sealed verdict over…”
State v. G.L.P., 590 P.2d 65 (Alaska 1979). · cites it 30× “In the instant case, both the district and superior courts construed the alleged violations of AS 28.35.010 as coming within the general rule.”
Nelson v. State, 597 P.2d 977 (Alaska 1979). · cites it 2× “515(b) 2 and joyriding in violation of AS 28.35.010. 3 This conviction was affirmed on appeal to the superior court.”
Sheakley v. State, 644 P.2d 864 (Alaska Ct. App. 1982). “220; his joyriding conviction, a misdemeanor, was under former AS 28.35.010(a). 2 . For persons who were convicted of second felonies, AS 12.”
Par. v. State, 477 P.2d 1005 (Alaska 1970). · cites it 2× “Appellant was convicted, after a trial by jury in the district court, of the offense of taking a motor vehicle without the owner's consent contrary to AS 28.35.010. On appeal he contends that the trial court erred in permitting the prosecution to cross-examine him concerning…”
State v. GLP, 590 P.2d 65 (Alaska 1979). · cites it 36× “In the instant case, both the district and superior courts construed the alleged violations of AS 28.35.010 as coming within the general rule.”
Nao v. State, 953 P.2d 522 (Alaska Ct. App. 1998). “On appeal, the supreme court reversed the district court and held that the minor should be prosecuted as an adult — because the legislature did not intend for the juvenile delinquency laws to apply: Read together, [former] AS 28.35.010(d) and [former] AS 47.10.010(b) demonstrate…”
Notar v. State, 580 P.2d 699 (Alaska 1978). · cites it 3× “Appellants were convicted by a jury in the district court of joyriding in violation of AS 28.35.010. 1 Michael Notar was sentenced to nine days with eight suspended and a fine of $400, while James Miller was sentenced to 12 days with 11 suspended and a fine of $500.”
Larson v. State, 598 P.2d 946 (Alaska 1979). · cites it 2× “Fred Larson, appellant, was sentenced to a one-year term of imprisonment, following his conviction for misdemeanor “joyriding” in violation of AS 28.35.010. 1 In this appeal Larson claims that that sentence is excessive.”
— Alaska Stat. § 28.35.010(a) — 5 cases
Bell v. State, 598 P.2d 908 (Alaska 1979). “On February 23, 1977, the grand jury returned an indictment charging Bell with felony joyriding, in violation of AS 28.35.010. The felony indictment was based upon the language of AS 28.”
Nelson v. State, 597 P.2d 977 (Alaska 1979). “515(b) 2 and joyriding in violation of AS 28.35.010. 3 This conviction was affirmed on appeal to the superior court.”
Sheakley v. State, 644 P.2d 864 (Alaska Ct. App. 1982). “220; his joyriding conviction, a misdemeanor, was under former AS 28.35.010(a). 2 . For persons who were convicted of second felonies, AS 12.”
State v. G.L.P., 590 P.2d 65 (Alaska 1979). “In the instant case, both the district and superior courts construed the alleged violations of AS 28.35.010 as coming within the general rule.”
State v. GLP, 590 P.2d 65 (Alaska 1979). “In the instant case, both the district and superior courts construed the alleged violations of AS 28.35.010 as coming within the general rule.”
— Alaska Stat. § 28.35.010(d) — 3 cases
State v. G.L.P., 590 P.2d 65 (Alaska 1979). “In the instant case, both the district and superior courts construed the alleged violations of AS 28.35.010 as coming within the general rule.”
Nao v. State, 953 P.2d 522 (Alaska Ct. App. 1998). “On appeal, the supreme court reversed the district court and held that the minor should be prosecuted as an adult — because the legislature did not intend for the juvenile delinquency laws to apply: Read together, [former] AS 28.35.010(d) and [former] AS 47.10.010(b) demonstrate…”
State v. GLP, 590 P.2d 65 (Alaska 1979). “In the instant case, both the district and superior courts construed the alleged violations of AS 28.35.010 as coming within the general rule.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.