Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 29.25.070 (2026)
Penalties
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 29.25.070. Penalties.
(a) For the violation of an ordinance, a municipality may by ordinance prescribe a penalty not to exceed a fine of $1,000 and imprisonment for 90 days, except as limited by (f) of this section. For a violation that cannot result in incarceration or the loss of a valuable license, a municipality may allow disposition of the violation without court appearance and establish a schedule of fine amounts for each offense.
(b) The municipality or an aggrieved person may institute a civil action against a person, including a minor as provided in AS 29.25.072, who violates an ordinance. In addition to injunctive and compensatory relief, a civil penalty not to exceed $1,000 may be imposed for each violation. An action to enjoin a violation may be brought notwithstanding the availability of any other remedy. On application for injunctive relief and a finding of a violation or a threatened violation, the superior court shall grant the injunction. Each day that a violation of an ordinance continues constitutes a separate violation.
(c) The penalties authorized under this section may be imposed only if copies of the ordinance are made available for distribution to the public at no more than cost.
(d) This section does not apply to an ordinance adopted under AS 04.11.501(c).
(e) The municipality shall provide written notice to the commissioner of family and community services or to the commissioner's designee of the commencement of a civil enforcement action for the violation of an ordinance under (b) of this section against a minor. Unless the commissioner and the municipality have negotiated an agreement making other arrangements for the municipality to provide the notice required by this subsection, the municipality shall provide the notice by mailing a copy of the citation or other document setting out the notice of the commencement of the civil enforcement action. This subsection applies to home rule and general law municipalities.
(f) If a municipality prescribes a penalty for a violation of a municipal ordinance, including a violation under (a) of this section, and there is a comparable state crime under AS 11 or AS 28 with elements that are similar to the municipal ordinance, the municipality may not impose a greater punishment than that imposed for a violation of the state crime. This subsection applies to home rule and general law municipalities.
(g) In this section, “minor” means a person under 18 years of age.
(a) For the violation of an ordinance, a municipality may by ordinance prescribe a penalty not to exceed a fine of $1,000 and imprisonment for 90 days, except as limited by (f) of this section. For a violation that cannot result in incarceration or the loss of a valuable license, a municipality may allow disposition of the violation without court appearance and establish a schedule of fine amounts for each offense.
(b) The municipality or an aggrieved person may institute a civil action against a person, including a minor as provided in AS 29.25.072, who violates an ordinance. In addition to injunctive and compensatory relief, a civil penalty not to exceed $1,000 may be imposed for each violation. An action to enjoin a violation may be brought notwithstanding the availability of any other remedy. On application for injunctive relief and a finding of a violation or a threatened violation, the superior court shall grant the injunction. Each day that a violation of an ordinance continues constitutes a separate violation.
(c) The penalties authorized under this section may be imposed only if copies of the ordinance are made available for distribution to the public at no more than cost.
(d) This section does not apply to an ordinance adopted under AS 04.11.501(c).
(e) The municipality shall provide written notice to the commissioner of family and community services or to the commissioner's designee of the commencement of a civil enforcement action for the violation of an ordinance under (b) of this section against a minor. Unless the commissioner and the municipality have negotiated an agreement making other arrangements for the municipality to provide the notice required by this subsection, the municipality shall provide the notice by mailing a copy of the citation or other document setting out the notice of the commencement of the civil enforcement action. This subsection applies to home rule and general law municipalities.
(f) If a municipality prescribes a penalty for a violation of a municipal ordinance, including a violation under (a) of this section, and there is a comparable state crime under AS 11 or AS 28 with elements that are similar to the municipal ordinance, the municipality may not impose a greater punishment than that imposed for a violation of the state crime. This subsection applies to home rule and general law municipalities.
(g) In this section, “minor” means a person under 18 years of age.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 2016–2019 · leading case: Mae Lu Good v. Mun. of Anchorage, 450 P.3d 693 (Alaska Ct. App. 2019).
Mae Lu Good v. Mun. of Anchorage, 450 P.3d 693 (Alaska Ct. App. 2019). “070(g) and Senate Bill 91 Subsection (g) of AS 29.25.070 was added in 2016 as part of Senate Bill 91.”
Mun. of Anchorage v. Beezley, 435 P.3d 978 (Alaska Ct. App. 2018). “" And AS 29.25.070(g) declares that whenever a municipality proscribes conduct by ordinance, and there is a comparable state crime defined in Title 11 or Title 28 of the statutes, "the municipality may not impose a greater punishment than that imposed for a violation of the…”
Akers v. State, 389 P.3d 65 (Alaska Ct. App. 2016). “AS 29.25.070(a). But home-rule municipalities, in contrast, may exercise all legislative powers not prohibited by law or by their charter.”
Penetac v. Mun. of Anchorage, 436 P.3d 1089 (Alaska Ct. App. 2019). “9 We note that there is, in fact, a statute- AS 29.25.070(g) -that prohibits municipalities (including home rule municipalities) from imposing a greater punishment for a municipal offense if there is a "comparable state offense under AS 11 or AS 28 with elements that are similar…”
Mun. of Anchorage v. Beezley (Alaska Ct. App. 2018). “” And AS 29.25.070(g) declares that whenever a municipality proscribes conduct by ordinance, and there is a comparable state crime defined in Title 11 or Title 28 of the statutes, “the municipality may not impose a greater punishment than that imposed for a violation of the…”
— Alaska Stat. § 29.25.070(a) — 1 case
Akers v. State, 389 P.3d 65 (Alaska Ct. App. 2016). “AS 29.25.070(a). But home-rule municipalities, in contrast, may exercise all legislative powers not prohibited by law or by their charter.”
— Alaska Stat. § 29.25.070(g) — 4 cases
Mae Lu Good v. Mun. of Anchorage, 450 P.3d 693 (Alaska Ct. App. 2019). “070(g) and Senate Bill 91 Subsection (g) of AS 29.25.070 was added in 2016 as part of Senate Bill 91.”
Mun. of Anchorage v. Beezley, 435 P.3d 978 (Alaska Ct. App. 2018). “" And AS 29.25.070(g) declares that whenever a municipality proscribes conduct by ordinance, and there is a comparable state crime defined in Title 11 or Title 28 of the statutes, "the municipality may not impose a greater punishment than that imposed for a violation of the…”
Penetac v. Mun. of Anchorage, 436 P.3d 1089 (Alaska Ct. App. 2019). “9 We note that there is, in fact, a statute- AS 29.25.070(g) -that prohibits municipalities (including home rule municipalities) from imposing a greater punishment for a municipal offense if there is a "comparable state offense under AS 11 or AS 28 with elements that are similar…”
Mun. of Anchorage v. Beezley (Alaska Ct. App. 2018). “” And AS 29.25.070(g) declares that whenever a municipality proscribes conduct by ordinance, and there is a comparable state crime defined in Title 11 or Title 28 of the statutes, “the municipality may not impose a greater punishment than that imposed for a violation of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.