Alaska Stat. » Chapter 34.15
Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 34.15.260 (2026)

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Secs. 34.15.260 — 34.15.340. Recording. [Repealed, § 43 ch 161 SLA 1988. For current law, see AS 40.17.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1971–1984 · leading case: H.A.M.S. Co. v. Elec. Contractors of Alaska, Inc., 563 P.2d 258 (Alaska 1977).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
H.A.M.S. Co. v. Elec. Contractors of Alaska, Inc., 563 P.2d 258 (Alaska 1977). · cites it 2× “See AS 34.15.260. [5] Like the majority, I do not pass on the other issues raised by appellants.”
Smalley v. Juneau Clinic Bldg. Corp., 493 P.2d 1296 (Alaska 1972). · cites it 2× “[15] AS 34.15.260. [16] § 58-2-2 ACLA (Cum.Supp.”
Metcalf v. Bartrand, 491 P.2d 747 (Alaska 1971). “320(a) (2); AS 34.15.260 (a) (3). 13 . Jameson v. Wurtz, 396 P.”
First Nat'l Bank of Anchorage v. Dent, 683 P.2d 722 (Alaska 1984). “250 of this chapter ... (2) may be recorded in the recording district in which the land is located, and (3) from the time it is filed with the recorder for record, it is constructive notice of the contents of the conveyance to subsequent purchasers and mortgagees of the same…”
Stauber v. Granger, 495 P.2d 67 (Alaska 1972). · cites it 2× “We do not consider the question of actual notice, because we have concluded that under AS 34.15.260(a) (3), 1 recordation of the use restrictions provided appellants with constructive notice.”
— Alaska Stat. § 34.15.260(a) — 2 cases
First Nat'l Bank of Anchorage v. Dent, 683 P.2d 722 (Alaska 1984). “250 of this chapter ... (2) may be recorded in the recording district in which the land is located, and (3) from the time it is filed with the recorder for record, it is constructive notice of the contents of the conveyance to subsequent purchasers and mortgagees of the same…”
Stauber v. Granger, 495 P.2d 67 (Alaska 1972). “We do not consider the question of actual notice, because we have concluded that under AS 34.15.260(a) (3), 1 recordation of the use restrictions provided appellants with constructive notice.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.