Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 36.05.030 (2026)
Authority; investigations; hearings; regulations; enforcement
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 36.05.030. Authority; investigations; hearings; regulations; enforcement.
(a) The Department of Labor and Workforce Development has the authority to determine the prevailing wage, and whether or not this chapter is being violated. The department may when necessary for the enforcement of this chapter
(1) conduct investigations and hold hearings concerning wages;
(2) compel the attendance of witnesses and the production of books, papers, and documents;
(3) adopt regulations.
(b) If a person violates this chapter the attorney general shall, when requested by the Department of Labor and Workforce Development, enforce these provisions.
(a) The Department of Labor and Workforce Development has the authority to determine the prevailing wage, and whether or not this chapter is being violated. The department may when necessary for the enforcement of this chapter
(1) conduct investigations and hold hearings concerning wages;
(2) compel the attendance of witnesses and the production of books, papers, and documents;
(3) adopt regulations.
(b) If a person violates this chapter the attorney general shall, when requested by the Department of Labor and Workforce Development, enforce these provisions.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1978–2022 · leading case: City & Borough of Sitka v. Constr. & Gen. Laborers Local 942, 644 P.2d 227 (Alaska 1982).
City & Borough of Sitka v. Constr. & Gen. Laborers Local 942, 644 P.2d 227 (Alaska 1982). “The Alaska Department of Labor has the authority pursuant to AS 36.05.030 to determine whether a contract is subject to Little Davis-Bacon.”
Dayhoff v. Temsco Helicopters, Inc., 772 P.2d 1085 (Alaska 1989). “AS 36.05.030(a). The attorney general enforces these provisions upon request by DOL.”
Alborn Constr., Inc. v. State of Alaska, Dep't of Labor & Workforce Dev., Labor Standards & Saf. Div., & Deborah Kelly, in an Off. capacity, 507 P.3d 468 (Alaska 2022). “28 The Act’s coverage depends in part on whether a contract involves public construction.29 We have warned that “attempts to disguise State involvement in [a] building contract” and “arrangements that could be designed to circumvent the Act’s application” may 24 See 8 AAC 30.”
Fowler v. City of Anchorage, 583 P.2d 817 (Alaska 1978). “This is set forth in AS 36.05.030(a), which provides in part: The Department of Labor has the authority to determine the prevailing wage, and whether or not §§ 10-110 of this chapter are being violated.”
— Alaska Stat. § 36.05.030(a) — 3 cases
Dayhoff v. Temsco Helicopters, Inc., 772 P.2d 1085 (Alaska 1989). “AS 36.05.030(a). The attorney general enforces these provisions upon request by DOL.”
Fowler v. City of Anchorage, 583 P.2d 817 (Alaska 1978). “This is set forth in AS 36.05.030(a), which provides in part: The Department of Labor has the authority to determine the prevailing wage, and whether or not §§ 10-110 of this chapter are being violated.”
City & Borough of Sitka v. Constr. & Gen. Laborers Local 942, 644 P.2d 227 (Alaska 1982). “The Alaska Department of Labor has the authority pursuant to AS 36.05.030 to determine whether a contract is subject to Little Davis-Bacon.”
— Alaska Stat. § 36.05.030(a)(1) — 1 case
Alborn Constr., Inc. v. State of Alaska, Dep't of Labor & Workforce Dev., Labor Standards & Saf. Div., & Deborah Kelly, in an Off. capacity, 507 P.3d 468 (Alaska 2022). “28 The Act’s coverage depends in part on whether a contract involves public construction.29 We have warned that “attempts to disguise State involvement in [a] building contract” and “arrangements that could be designed to circumvent the Act’s application” may 24 See 8 AAC 30.”
— Alaska Stat. § 36.05.030(b) — 1 case
Dayhoff v. Temsco Helicopters, Inc., 772 P.2d 1085 (Alaska 1989). “AS 36.05.030(a). The attorney general enforces these provisions upon request by DOL.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.