Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 40.15.030 (2026)
Dedication of streets, alleys, and thoroughfares
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 40.15.030. Dedication of streets, alleys, and thoroughfares.
When an area is subdivided and a plat of the subdivision is approved, filed, and recorded, all streets, alleys, thoroughfares, parks and other public areas shown on the plat are considered to be dedicated to public use.
When an area is subdivided and a plat of the subdivision is approved, filed, and recorded, all streets, alleys, thoroughfares, parks and other public areas shown on the plat are considered to be dedicated to public use.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1966–2025 · leading case: Cowan v. Yeisley, 255 P.3d 966 (Alaska 2011).
Cowan v. Yeisley, 255 P.3d 966 (Alaska 2011). “35 Former AS 40.15.030, in effect in 1980 and 1981, stated: "When an area is subdivided and a plat of the subdivision is approved and recorded, all streets, alleys, thoroughfares, parks and other public areas shown on the plat are deemed to have been dedicated to public use.”
State v. Anderson, 749 P.2d 1342 (Alaska 1988). “020), they can accept dedications of public streets (see AS 40.15.030), and they can assert some basic control over city planning and development.”
Chugach Elec. Ass'n v. Calais Co., 410 P.2d 508 (Alaska 1966). “[6] The words "other public area" as used in AS 40.15.030, and "other open spaces" as used in the certificate of ownership and dedication, being preceded by the terms "streets, alleys, walks, parks and thoroughfares", will be construed as referring to things of the same general…”
State v. Fairbanks Lodge No. 1392, Loyal Order of Moose, 633 P.2d 1378 (Alaska 1981). “AS 40.15.030 provides: When an area is subdivided and a plat of the subdivision is approved and recorded, all streets, alleys, thoroughfares, parks and other public areas shown on the plat are deemed to have been dedicated to public use.”
Laughlin v. Everhart, 678 P.2d 926 (Alaska 1984). “AS 40.15.030 6 provides that all platted roads are deemed to have been dedicated to the public.”
Arthur Behm v. John Ketchum & the Matanuska-Susitna Borough (Alaska 2025). “14 Here, the plat is not ambiguous, so we are not required to take the analysis any further. CONCLUSION The judgment of the superior court is REVERSED and the attorney’s fee award is VACATED.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.