Alaska Stat. » Chapter 43.23
Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 43.23.065 (2026)

Exemption of and levy on permanent fund dividends. [Renumbered as

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 43.23.065. Exemption of and levy on permanent fund dividends. [Renumbered as AS 43.23.140.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1989–2008 · leading case: State v. Albert, 899 P.2d 103 (Alaska 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Albert, 899 P.2d 103 (Alaska 1995). “AS 43.23.065(b). 11 . For convenience we follow the parties’ practice of using "Criminal Rule 39" to refer not only to the provisions of the rule but to the other elements of our recoupment system.”
Lauber v. Alaska (In Re Browne), 101 B.R. 188 (Bankr. D. Alaska 1989). “AS 43.23.065. There have been some recent modifications to the PFD statute to restrict alienability, but these changes do not affect this adversary proceeding.”
In Re Tinkess, 459 B.R. 76 (Bankr. D. Alaska 2008). · cites it 3× “ANIC argues that only 20% of the PFD may be exempted, pursuant to AS 43.23.065. ANIC contends the debtors had no property interest in the PFDs when they filed their bankruptcy petitions, and therefore couldn’t claim the PFDs exempt under § 522(d)(5).”
Camacho v. United States (In re Camacho), 177 B.R. 667 (Bankr. D. Alaska 1994). “AS 43.23.065. Until the IRS actually received the permanent fund dividend from the State of Alaska, its interest in this asset was no greater than that of any other levying creditor.”
— Alaska Stat. § 43.23.065(a) — 1 case
In Re Tinkess, 459 B.R. 76 (Bankr. D. Alaska 2008). “ANIC argues that only 20% of the PFD may be exempted, pursuant to AS 43.23.065. ANIC contends the debtors had no property interest in the PFDs when they filed their bankruptcy petitions, and therefore couldn’t claim the PFDs exempt under § 522(d)(5).”
— Alaska Stat. § 43.23.065(b) — 1 case
State v. Albert, 899 P.2d 103 (Alaska 1995). “AS 43.23.065(b). 11 . For convenience we follow the parties’ practice of using "Criminal Rule 39" to refer not only to the provisions of the rule but to the other elements of our recoupment system.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.