Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 1
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 1-102 (2026)

Repealing clause

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

All laws and statutes of a general, public and permanent nature now in force and effect are repealed effective twelve o'clock noon on January 9, 1956.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1958–2026 · leading case: Ader v. Est. of Felger, 375 P.3d 97 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ader v. Est. of Felger, 375 P.3d 97 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016). “Code § 1-102(b)(3). A.R.S. § 14-3803 ¶ 12 In relevant part, § 14-3803 provides: A All claims against a decedent’s estate that arose before the death of the decedent, including claims of the state and any of its political subdivisions, whether due or to become due, absolute or…”
State Ex Rel. Morrison v. Anway, 349 P.2d 774 (Ariz. 1960). · cites it 4× “" The deliberate deletion of all reference thereto in the Act of 1953 would ordinarily be sufficient to compel the conclusion that the legislature in 1956 intended to repeal the whole Act of 1953, A.R.S. § 1-102 were it not for A.R.S. § 1-104 providing that the adoption and…”
Standhardt v. Superior Court, 77 P.3d 451 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003). “15A, §§ 1-102(b), -112 (2002) (adoption and custody); Cal.”
Salt River Proj. Agric. Improvement & Power Dist. v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 694 P.2d 198 (Ariz. 1984). “Thus, preventing accidents by deterring the distribution of unsafe products is one of the prime goals of tort law.”
Ellis v. Valley Nat'l Bank, 609 P.2d 1073 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1980). “) § 1-102) provides that two purposes of the Code are (1) simplifying the law of decedents’ estates, and (2) making this law uniform among the states.”
Matter of Est. of Johnson, 630 P.2d 1039 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1981). “§ 1-102(b)(2). With respect to the execution of wills, the purpose of the Code is to simplify the requirements of execution and validate the will whenever possible.”
Peterson v. Flood, 326 P.2d 845 (Ariz. 1958). “) It is urged in the brief amicus curiae, that (a) “judge or justice” did not mean justice of the peace and (b) if it did, removal of that phrase in the 1956 codification was a legislative repeal of the grant under A.”
Matter of Est. of Muder, 751 P.2d 986 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1988). “§ 14-1102(B)(2), derived from Uniform Probate Code § 1-102(b)(2). Yet the majority feel compelled toward this exercise in compound frustration by the requirement of A.”
Steward v. Superior Court of Maricopa Cnty., 383 P.2d 191 (Ariz. 1963). “Section 1-102 A.R.S. (1956) specifically provided that all laws and statutes of a general nature were repealed.”
Ctr. for Az v. Az Sec'y of State (Ariz. 2026). · cites it 2× “See A.R.S. § 1-102 (repealing “[a]ll laws and statutes of a general, public and permanent nature”).”
Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc. v. Arizona Dep't of Revenue, 935 P.2d 906 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1996). “As to the majority’s reliance on case law, Weyerhaeuser depends on Illinois Income Tax Act section 1-102 whose broad language shows an intent to adopt both sections (1) and (2) of 26 U.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 1-102(b) — 1 case
Standhardt v. Superior Court, 77 P.3d 451 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003). “15A, §§ 1-102(b), -112 (2002) (adoption and custody); Cal.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 1-102(b)(2) — 2 cases
Matter of Est. of Johnson, 630 P.2d 1039 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1981). “§ 1-102(b)(2). With respect to the execution of wills, the purpose of the Code is to simplify the requirements of execution and validate the will whenever possible.”
Matter of Est. of Muder, 751 P.2d 986 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1988). “§ 14-1102(B)(2), derived from Uniform Probate Code § 1-102(b)(2). Yet the majority feel compelled toward this exercise in compound frustration by the requirement of A.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 1-102(b)(3) — 1 case
Ader v. Est. of Felger, 375 P.3d 97 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016). “Code § 1-102(b)(3). A.R.S. § 14-3803 ¶ 12 In relevant part, § 14-3803 provides: A All claims against a decedent’s estate that arose before the death of the decedent, including claims of the state and any of its political subdivisions, whether due or to become due, absolute or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.