Arizona Revised Statutes
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 1-216 (2026)
Joint authority of public officers; quorum of board or commission
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
A. Words purporting to give a joint authority to three or more public officers or other persons shall be construed as giving the authority to a majority of the officers or persons unless it is otherwise expressly declared in the law giving the authority.
B. A majority of a board or commission shall constitute a quorum.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1981–2017 · leading case: Schmitz v. Arizona State Bd. of Dental Examiners, 684 P.2d 918 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1984).
Schmitz v. Arizona State Bd. of Dental Examiners, 684 P.2d 918 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1984). “Schmitz contends that the committee’s actions in this case were void because the lay member was not present at the hearing when the complaint against him was considered. We disagree.”
State ex rel. Gonzalez v. Superior Court, 907 P.2d 72 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1995). “; see also A.R.S. § 1-216(A) (1995). Hence, if a parole hearing panel consisted of either four or five Board members, a majority vote of three was required for the prisoner’s release.”
Johnson v. Arizona Registrar of Contractors, 396 P.3d 645 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017). “” A.R.S. § 1-216(1) (Supp. 2016); Semple v.”
Croaff v. Evans, 636 P.2d 131 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1981). “are in accord with the Arizona statute governing boards and commissions generally, A.R.S. § 1-216, which provides: “A. Words purporting to give a joint authority to three or more public officers or other persons shall be construed as giving the authority to a majority of the…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 1-216(1) — 1 case
Johnson v. Arizona Registrar of Contractors, 396 P.3d 645 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017). “” A.R.S. § 1-216(1) (Supp. 2016); Semple v.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 1-216(A) — 1 case
State ex rel. Gonzalez v. Superior Court, 907 P.2d 72 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1995). “; see also A.R.S. § 1-216(A) (1995). Hence, if a parole hearing panel consisted of either four or five Board members, a majority vote of three was required for the prisoner’s release.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.