A. In addition to any other county power or authority the board of supervisors may adopt fee schedules for any specific products and services the county provides to the public. Notwithstanding fee schedules or individual charges in statute, a board of supervisors may adopt an additional charge or separate individual charge.
B. Any fee or charge established pursuant to this section must be attributable to and defray or cover the expense of the product or service for which the fee or charge is assessed. A fee or charge shall not exceed the actual cost of the product or service.
C. Before adoption of a fee for service or an additional or separate charge pursuant to this section, the board of supervisors shall hold a public hearing on the issue with at least fifteen days' published notice.
D. Nothing in this section shall apply to products and services provided to cities and towns.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
5
cases, 2007–2018 · leading case:
State v. Payne, 225 P.3d 1131 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
State v. Payne, 225 P.3d 1131 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
· cites it 21× “05 and A.R.S. § 11-251.08 which authorize[ ] the Board of Supervisors to adopt and enforce all ordinances necessary or proper to carry out the duties, responsibilities and functions of the county government and to adopt fee schedules for any specific services provided by the…”
State v. Soria, 170 P.3d 710 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007).
· cites it 2× “The fee is authorized by A.R.S. § 11-251.08(A) (2001), which provides, "the board of supervisors may adopt fee schedules for any specific products and services the county provides to the public.”
State of Arizona v. Payne Nelson Daniels (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
· cites it 22× “05 and A.R.S. § 11-251.08 which authorize[] the Board of Supervisors to adopt and enforce all ordinances necessary or proper to carry out the duties, responsibilities and functions of the county government and to adopt fee schedules for any specific services provided by the…”
State v. Ayonayon, 428 P.3d 203 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2018).
· cites it 6× “CONCLUSION ¶ 10 For the foregoing reasons, the superior court's order affirming the bench warrant fee is affirmed. Passage of the fee was reflected as Board of Supervisors agenda item number C-38-04-022-8-00.”
State v. Wheeler (Ariz. Ct. App. 2018).
“”) section 11-251.08, authorizes the superior court to impose a fee on defendants “whose arrest is commanded by a bench warrant for, (1) their failure to appear in court as required; or (2) their failure to pay outstanding fines and fees.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 11-251.08(A) — 4 cases
State v. Payne, 225 P.3d 1131 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
“05 and A.R.S. § 11-251.08 which authorize[ ] the Board of Supervisors to adopt and enforce all ordinances necessary or proper to carry out the duties, responsibilities and functions of the county government and to adopt fee schedules for any specific services provided by the…”
State v. Soria, 170 P.3d 710 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007).
“The fee is authorized by A.R.S. § 11-251.08(A) (2001), which provides, "the board of supervisors may adopt fee schedules for any specific products and services the county provides to the public.”
State of Arizona v. Payne Nelson Daniels (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
“05 and A.R.S. § 11-251.08 which authorize[] the Board of Supervisors to adopt and enforce all ordinances necessary or proper to carry out the duties, responsibilities and functions of the county government and to adopt fee schedules for any specific services provided by the…”
State v. Ayonayon, 428 P.3d 203 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2018).
“CONCLUSION ¶ 10 For the foregoing reasons, the superior court's order affirming the bench warrant fee is affirmed. Passage of the fee was reflected as Board of Supervisors agenda item number C-38-04-022-8-00.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 11-251.08(B) — 3 cases
State v. Payne, 225 P.3d 1131 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
“05 and A.R.S. § 11-251.08 which authorize[ ] the Board of Supervisors to adopt and enforce all ordinances necessary or proper to carry out the duties, responsibilities and functions of the county government and to adopt fee schedules for any specific services provided by the…”
State v. Ayonayon, 428 P.3d 203 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2018).
“CONCLUSION ¶ 10 For the foregoing reasons, the superior court's order affirming the bench warrant fee is affirmed. Passage of the fee was reflected as Board of Supervisors agenda item number C-38-04-022-8-00.”
State of Arizona v. Payne Nelson Daniels (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
“05 and A.R.S. § 11-251.08 which authorize[] the Board of Supervisors to adopt and enforce all ordinances necessary or proper to carry out the duties, responsibilities and functions of the county government and to adopt fee schedules for any specific services provided by the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.