Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 11-352
Adoption of limited county employee merit system by resolution; precinct committeemen
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
A. Any county may by resolution of the board adopt a limited county employee merit system. This system may be applied to county-appointed officers and employees. Elected officers shall not be included in such a merit system.
B. Notwithstanding any other law, rule or ordinance, a county employee may serve in the office of precinct committeeman.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1971–2024 · leading case: Saldate v. Montgomery
Hounshell v. White (2008)
“County Merit Systems ¶ 10 Independent of the foregoing, any county in Arizona may “adopt a limited county employee merit system as is adaptable to its size and type.”
Saldate v. Montgomery (2012)
“Under that authority, the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution establishing both the Merit System and the Commission. Resolution § 1; see also AR.S. § 11-353 (2001).”
LaWALL v. PIMA COUNTY MERIT COMMISSION And SCAMMON (2006)
“That jurisdiction is granted in § 11-352, which permits counties to create a merit system commission, and in § 11-354, which grants that commission the powers necessary to accomplish the purposes of the merit system.”
Holohan v. Mahoney (1971)
“§ 11-352 reads as follows : “Any county may by resolution of the board adopt a limited county employee merit system for any and all county appointive officers and employees.”
Dj North v. Omnisource (2024)
“OmniSource seeks costs under either A.R.S. § 11-352 or § 12-352, neither of which is a basis for awarding costs.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 11-352(A) — 2 cases
Hounshell v. White (2008)
“County Merit Systems ¶ 10 Independent of the foregoing, any county in Arizona may “adopt a limited county employee merit system as is adaptable to its size and type.”
LaWALL v. PIMA COUNTY MERIT COMMISSION And SCAMMON (2006)
“That jurisdiction is granted in § 11-352, which permits counties to create a merit system commission, and in § 11-354, which grants that commission the powers necessary to accomplish the purposes of the merit system.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.