Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 11-447 (2026)

Service of process regular on its face

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A sheriff or other ministerial officer is justified in the execution of, and shall execute all process and orders regular on their face and issued by competent authority, whatever may be the defect in the proceedings upon which they were issued.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2003–2018 · leading case: Tenorio-Serrano v. Driscoll, 324 F. Supp. 3d 1053 (D. Ariz. 2018).
Tenorio-Serrano v. Driscoll, 324 F. Supp. 3d 1053 (D. Ariz. 2018). · cites it 2× “But these statutes do not expressly authorize the Sheriff to continue detention at the request of a federal agency. Defendants cite A.R.S. § 31-122(A), which provides that "[t]he sheriff may receive and keep in the county jail any prisoner committed thereto by process or order…”
Torrez v. Knowlton, 73 P.3d 1285 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “Also, as the sheriff and the deputy point out, A.R.S. § 11-447 provides that a sheriff "shall execute all process and orders regular on their face and issued by competent authority, whatever may be the defect in the proceedings upon which they were issued.”
Torrez v. Knowlton Dupnik (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “17, at 3:99 (apparently valid warrant affords arresting officer privilege when warrant properly served); Keeton, supra, § 17, at 111 (officer 2 Also, as the sheriff and the deputy point out, A.R.S. § 11-447 provides that a sheriff “shall execute all process and orders regular on…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.