Payment of compensation and damages may be made to a defendant or defendants entitled thereto, or the money may be deposited in court and distributed to the defendant or defendants entitled thereto. At the time the money is paid or deposited, all unpaid property taxes which were levied as of the date of the order for immediate possession, including penalties and interest, that are due on the property condemned shall be paid to the county treasurer in the county in which the condemned property is located. If the money is not so paid or deposited, the defendant or defendants or the county treasurer may have execution as in civil actions, and if the money cannot be collected on execution, the court, upon a showing to that effect, shall set aside and annul the entire proceedings, and restore possession of the property to defendant or defendants, if possession has been taken by plaintiff.
Notes of Decisions
Dabrowski v. Bartlett, 442 P.3d 811 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019).
· cites it 2× “2, § 17 (emphasis added); see also A.R.S. § 12-1124 (in an eminent domain proceeding, the court “shall set aside and annul the entire proceeding[]” when the condemnee is unable to collect payment).”
City of Phoenix v. Johnson, 204 P.3d 447 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
· cites it 6× “Under protest, the City paid the remaining amount of the judgment by depositing the funds with the clerk of the superior court, pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 12-1124 and 12-1127. In its notice of payment, the City argued that the automatic stay provision of Rule 62(g) should be…”
City of Phoenix v. McCullough, 536 P.2d 230 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1975).
· cites it 4× “" (emphasis supplied) And, finally, A.R.S. § 12-1124 (1956) provides that if after judgment the plaintiff fails to deposit the funds in court, "the defendant or defendants may have execution as in civil actions, and if the money cannot be collected on execution, the court, upon…”
Flood Control Dist. of Maricopa Cty. v. Hing, 709 P.2d 1351 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985).
· cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 12-1124 (1982) authorizes the condemnor to make the payment of damages either to the defendants directly or to the court.”
City of Phoenix v. Superior Court, 762 P.2d 128 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1988).
· cites it 2× “For example, in inverse condemnation actions, A.R.S. § 12-1124 provides the following remedies: Payment of compensation and damages may be made to a defendant or defendants entitled thereto, or the money may be deposited in court and distributed to the defendant or defendants…”
Pima Cty. v. McCarville Ex Rel. Pinal Cty., 231 P.3d 370 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2010).
“After a jury determined the amount of compensation to which Johnson was entitled, the city deposited with the court the remaining sum due under the judgment pursuant to §§ 12-1124 and 12-1127. 4 Johnson, 220 Ariz.”
State Ex Rel. Mendez v. Am. SUPPORT, 100 P.3d 932 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2004).
· cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 12-1124 (2003). Finally, a final order of condemnation will only be entered if all unpaid property taxes have been paid.”
Pima Cnty. v. Dos Picos Land Ltd. P'ship Shepard, Et Ux. (Ariz. Ct. App. 2010).
“After a jury determined the amount of compensation to which Johnson was entitled, the city deposited with the court the remaining sum due under the judgment pursuant to §§ 12-1124 and 12-1127. 4 Johnson, 220 Ariz.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.